Intellectual property issues in genomics

被引:14
作者
Eisenberg, RS
机构
[1] University of Michigan Law School, Hutchins Hall, Ann Arbor, MI 48109
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
D O I
10.1016/0167-7799(96)10040-8
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Controversy over intellectual property rights in the results of large-scale cDNA sequencing raises intriguing questions about the roles of the public and private sectors in genomics research, and about who stands to benefit (and who stands to lose) from the private appropriation of genomic information, While the US Patent and Trademark Office has rejected patent applications on cDNA fragments of unknown function from the National Institutes of Health, private firms have pursued three distinct strategies for exploiting unpatented cDNA sequence information: exclusive licensing, non-exclusive licensing and dedication to the public domain.
引用
收藏
页码:302 / 307
页数:6
相关论文
共 47 条
[11]  
COCHERTY P, 1993, AKRON LAW REV, V26, P525
[12]  
Cohen J., 1995, SCIENCE, V268, p[1705, 1705]
[13]   POSITIONAL CLONING MOVES FROM PERDITIONAL TO TRADITIONAL [J].
COLLINS, FS .
NATURE GENETICS, 1995, 9 (04) :347-350
[14]  
EISENBERG R, 1994, RISK HLTH SAFETY ENV, V5, P163
[15]   GENES, PATENTS, AND PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT [J].
EISENBERG, RS .
SCIENCE, 1992, 257 (5072) :903-908
[16]   PROPRIETARY RIGHTS AND THE NORMS OF SCIENCE IN BIOTECHNOLOGY RESEARCH [J].
EISENBERG, RS .
YALE LAW JOURNAL, 1987, 97 (02) :177-231
[17]  
EISENBERG RS, 1994, U PITT LAW REV, V55, P633
[18]  
FISHER L, 1996, NY TIMES 0703, pC3
[19]   RECOMBINANT-DNA TECHNOLOGY - A SCIENCE STRUGGLING WITH THE PATENT-LAW [J].
GREENFIELD, MS .
STANFORD LAW REVIEW, 1992, 44 (05) :1051-1094
[20]   ON GENE PATENTING [J].
HEALY, B .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1992, 327 (09) :664-668