Early unilateral follicular aspiration compared with coasting for the prevention of severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: a prospective randomized study

被引:53
作者
Egbase, PE
Al Sharhan, M
Grudzinskas, JG
机构
[1] Royal London Hosp, St Bartholomews & Royal London Sch Med & Dent, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, London E1 1BB, England
[2] Matern Hosp, IVF Ctr, Safat, Kuwait
关键词
early follicular aspiration; ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome; prolonged coasting;
D O I
10.1093/humrep/14.6.1421
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Thirty women undergoing in-vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection considered to be at high risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) were randomly allocated to have early unilateral follicular aspiration (EUFA) (group 1) or coasting (group 2) when the serum oestradiol concentration was >6000 pg/ml and there were more than 15 follicles each of greater than or equal to 18 mm diameter in each ovary. EUFA was performed in group 1 at 10-12 h after the human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) trigger injection and human menopausal gonadotrophin (HMG) were withheld for 4.9 +/- 1.6 days until serum oestradiol concentrations fell below 3000 pg/ml when HCG was administered. The mean total dose and duration of administration of HMG were similar in groups 1 and 2 (48.3 +/- 17.4 and 50.2 +/- 16.5 ampoules; 13.7 +/- 2.2 and 14.1 +/- 3.2 days respectively). The mean serum oestradiol concentrations (9911 pg/ml versus 10 055 pg/ml) and number of follicles (43.3 versus 41.4) seen in both ovaries on the day of HCG administration in group 1 and on the day coasting was commenced in group 2 were also similar. After coasting, the mean serum oestradiol concentration on the day of HCG administration in group 2 was lower than in group 1 (1410 pg/ml versus 9911 pg/ml; P < 0.001). The mean serum progesterone concentrations on the day of HCG administration in bath groups were similar, and fell in all women in group 2. The mean number of oocytes retrieved and percentage of oocytes retrieved per follicle punctured was significantly higher in group 1 (15.4 +/- 2.1 versus 9.6 +/- 3.2, P < 0.001; 91.4 +/- 4.4% versus 28.3 +/- 3.7%, P < 0.001 respectively). The fertilization and embryo cleavage rates were similar in both groups. Clinical pregnancy was diagnosed in 6/15 (40%) patients in group 1 and in 5/15 (33%) patients in group 2, while four women in group 1 and three in group 2 developed severe OHSS.
引用
收藏
页码:1421 / 1425
页数:5
相关论文
共 34 条
[21]  
LunenfeId B, 1978, DIAGNOSIS TREATMENT, P76
[22]  
NAVOT D, 1992, FERTIL STERIL, V58, P249
[23]  
NAVOT D, 1987, FERTIL STERIL, V48, P57
[24]   INTRAVENOUS ALBUMIN DOES NOT PREVENT THE DEVELOPMENT OF SEVERE OVARIAN HYPERSTIMULATION SYNDROME IN AN IN-VITRO FERTILIZATION PROGRAM [J].
NG, E ;
LEADER, A ;
CLAMAN, P ;
DOMINGO, M ;
SPENCE, JEH .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 1995, 10 (04) :807-810
[25]   HUMAN MENOPAUSAL GONADOTROPINS FOR ANOVULATION AND STERILITY - RESULTS OF 7 YEARS OF TREATMENT [J].
RABAU, E ;
DAVID, A ;
SERR, DM ;
MASCHIAC.S ;
LUNENFELD, B .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1967, 98 (01) :92-+
[26]   The use of laparoscopic ovarian electrocautery in preventing cancellation of in-vitro fertilization treatment cycles due to risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome in women with polycystic ovaries [J].
Rimington, MR ;
Walker, SM ;
Shaw, RW .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 1997, 12 (07) :1443-1447
[27]  
SCHENKER JG, 1978, FERTIL STERIL, V30, P255
[28]   INDUCTION OF PREOVULATORY LUTEINIZING-HORMONE SURGE BY GONADOTROPIN-RELEASING-HORMONE AGONIST FOR WOMEN AT RISK FOR DEVELOPING THE OVARIAN HYPERSTIMULATION SYNDROME [J].
SHALEV, E ;
GESLEVICH, Y ;
BENAMI, M .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 1994, 9 (03) :417-419
[29]   'Prolonged coasting': An effective method for preventing severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome in patients undergoing in-vitro fertilization [J].
Sher, G ;
Zouves, C ;
Feinman, M ;
Maassarani, G .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 1995, 10 (12) :3107-3109
[30]   Early timed follicular aspiration prevents severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome [J].
Tomazevic, T ;
MedenVrtovec, H .
JOURNAL OF ASSISTED REPRODUCTION AND GENETICS, 1996, 13 (04) :282-286