Phobia-related cognitive bias for pictorial and linguistic stimuli

被引:67
作者
Kindt, M [1 ]
Brosschot, JF [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV AMSTERDAM, DEPT CLIN PSYCHOL, NL-1018 WB AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
关键词
D O I
10.1037/0021-843X.106.4.644
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
The purpose of this study was to examine whether anxiety-related cognitive bias for threat is stronger for threatening pictures than for threatening words. Spider-phobic participants (n = 31) and control participants (n = 33) performed a pictorial and linguistic spider Stroop task. Spider-phobic participants showed a marked bias for threat. However, this bias was similar for pictures: and for words, although the spider-phobic group evaluated the pictures as being more aversive. The results suggest that automatic processing of threatening information in people with phobias is triggered in aa on-off fashion, independent of subjective threat of the stimuli. This lack of distinction in automatic processing of weak and strong predictors of danger may be fundamental to the irrational nature of anxiety disorders.
引用
收藏
页码:644 / 648
页数:5
相关论文
共 17 条
[11]   ATTENTIONAL BIAS AND FACILITATED ESCAPE - A PICTORIAL TEST [J].
LAVY, E ;
VANDENHOUT, M ;
ARNTZ, A .
ADVANCES IN BEHAVIOUR RESEARCH AND THERAPY, 1993, 15 (04) :279-289
[12]  
LeDoux Joseph, 1989, Cognition and Emotion, V3, P267, DOI DOI 10.1080/02699938908412709
[13]   HALF A CENTURY OF RESEARCH ON THE STROOP EFFECT - AN INTEGRATIVE REVIEW [J].
MACLEOD, CM .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1991, 109 (02) :163-203
[14]   NO ATTENTIONAL BIAS FOR PICTORIAL STIMULI IN SPIDER-FEARFUL SUBJECTS [J].
MERCKELBACH, H ;
KENEMANS, JL ;
DIJKSTRA, A ;
SCHOUTEN, E .
JOURNAL OF PSYCHOPATHOLOGY AND BEHAVIORAL ASSESSMENT, 1993, 15 (03) :197-206
[15]   Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders [J].
Mittal, Vijay A. ;
Walker, Elaine F. .
PSYCHIATRY RESEARCH, 2011, 189 (01) :158-159
[16]  
Richards A, 1996, J ABNORM PSYCHOL, V105, P132
[17]   Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions [J].
Stroop, JR .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1935, 18 :643-662