Does Knowledge Base Compatibility Help or Hurt Knowledge Sharing Between Suppliers in Coopetition? The Role of Customer Participation

被引:155
作者
Ho, Hilbun [1 ,2 ]
Ganesan, Shankar [3 ]
机构
[1] Nanyang Technol Univ, Div Mkt & Int Business, Singapore, Singapore
[2] Nanyang Technol Univ, Inst Asian Consumer Insight, Singapore, Singapore
[3] Univ Notre Dame, Mendoza Coll Business, Notre Dame, IN 46556 USA
关键词
buyer-seller relationships; knowledge governance; knowledge sharing; customer participation; survey methodology; BUYER-SELLER RELATIONSHIPS; RESOURCE-BASED VIEW; ABSORPTIVE-CAPACITY; STRATEGIC ALLIANCES; JOINT VENTURES; INTERFIRM COOPERATION; COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE; PERFORMANCE; INNOVATION; PERSPECTIVE;
D O I
10.1509/jm.11.570
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Competing suppliers that collaborate to serve downstream original equipment manufacturer customers often encounter partners with overlapping and compatible knowledge bases. Such knowledge base compatibility provides supplier partners the opportunity to exchange knowledge efficiently, leading to greater knowledge sharing. However, the ease of misappropriation of the shared knowledge can offset this beneficial effect. This research proposes that the effect of knowledge base compatibility on supplier partners' knowledge sharing is moderated by the customer's participation in the collaborative effort and by the customer value such effort creates. The results of two empirical studies show that when levels of both customer participation and customer value are high, knowledge base compatibility between supplier partners leads to greater knowledge sharing. In contrast, when customer participation is high but customer value is low, knowledge base compatibility leads to lower levels of supplier knowledge sharing. This investigation validates the importance of key factors related to supplier partners' opportunity and motivation to share knowledge in coopetitive partnerships.
引用
收藏
页码:91 / 107
页数:17
相关论文
共 73 条
[21]   Different knowledge, different benefits: Toward a productivity perspective on knowledge sharing in organizations [J].
Haas, Martine R. ;
Hansen, Morten T. .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2007, 28 (11) :1133-1153
[22]   COMPETITION FOR COMPETENCE AND INTER-PARTNER LEARNING WITHIN INTERNATIONAL STRATEGIC ALLIANCES [J].
HAMEL, G .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 1991, 12 :83-103
[23]  
Hansen Morten T., ACAD MANAGEMENT J, V48, P776
[24]   The search-transfer problem: The role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits [J].
Hansen, MT .
ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 1999, 44 (01) :82-111
[25]   Interfirm monitoring, social contracts, and relationship outcomes [J].
Heide, Jan B. ;
Wathne, Kenneth H. ;
Rokkan, Aksel I. .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 2007, 44 (03) :425-433
[26]  
Heiman B.A., 2004, MANAG DECIS ECON, V25, P401, DOI [10.1002/mde.1198, DOI 10.1002/MDE.1198]
[27]   CROSS-UNDERSTANDING: IMPLICATIONS FOR GROUP COGNITION AND PERFORMANCE [J].
Huber, George P. ;
Lewis, Kyle .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2010, 35 (01) :6-26
[28]   Learning through alliances: General Motors and NUMMI [J].
Inkpen, AC .
CALIFORNIA MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2005, 47 (04) :114-+
[29]  
Inkpen AC, 2005, ACAD MANAGE REV, V30, P146, DOI [10.5465/AMR.2005.15281445, 10.2307/20159100]
[30]   Learning through joint ventures: A framework of knowledge acquisition [J].
Inkpen, AC .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT STUDIES, 2000, 37 (07) :1019-1043