Pricing and lead time decisions for make-to-order firms with contingent orders

被引:91
作者
Easton, FF [1 ]
Moodie, DR
机构
[1] Syracuse Univ, Sch Management, Robert H Brethen Operat Management Inst, Syracuse, NY 13244 USA
[2] Michigan Technol Univ, Sch Business & Econ, Houghton, MI 49931 USA
关键词
bidding; demand management;
D O I
10.1016/S0377-2217(98)00101-5
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Make-to-order (MTO) firms have few standard products and volatile, difficult-to-predict demand. A production order usually stems from a successful bid, which presents the MTO firm's terms (including price and lead time) to satisfy a prospective customer's stated requirements. The customer may decide to accept, reject, or modify these terms. Until the customer decides, the tendered bid is a contingent demand on the MTO firm's future production capacity. In the short run, this capacity may be relatively fixed and, if the customer awards the contract to another bidder, it may simply go to waste. To hedge against this possibility, the MTO firm can bid on other projects that require the same capacity. However, this strategy introduces a new source of lead time uncertainty. If two or more booked orders must contend for the same resources, some work will inevitably be "bumped" to later time periods. Thus, a hedging strategy carries the risk of penalties for late deliveries. In this paper we model this little-discussed source of lead time uncertainty and introduce a technique that simultaneously optimizes pricing and lead time decisions for MTO firms with contingent orders. We illustrate the procedure with a simple numerical example. (C) 1999 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:305 / 318
页数:14
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]   OPTIMUM MARK-UP FOR BIDDING - A PREFERENCE-UNCERTAINTY TRADE OFF APPROACH [J].
AHMAD, I ;
MINKARAH, IA .
CIVIL ENGINEERING SYSTEMS, 1987, 4 (04) :170-174
[2]  
Ahmad I., 1988, J MANAGE ENG, V4, P229, DOI DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)9742-597X(1988)4:3(229)
[3]   APPLICATION OF A PROBABILISTIC DECISION-MODEL TO AIRLINE SEAT INVENTORY CONTROL [J].
BELOBABA, PP .
OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 1989, 37 (02) :183-197
[4]  
BERKSON J, 1953, J AM STAT ASSOC, V48, P565
[5]   THE EFFECT OF WORKLOAD DEPENDENT DUE-DATES ON JOB SHOP PERFORMANCE [J].
BERTRAND, JWM .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1983, 29 (07) :799-816
[6]   OVERBOOKING DECISION RULES [J].
BODILY, SE ;
PFEIFER, PE .
OMEGA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1992, 20 (01) :129-133
[7]  
BOOKBINDER JH, 1985, J OPER RES SOC, V36, P1017, DOI 10.1057/jors.1985.181
[8]   OPTIMAL DUE-DATE ASSIGNMENT IN A JOB SHOP [J].
CHENG, TCE .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH, 1986, 24 (03) :503-515
[9]   VENDOR SELECTION AND BUYING PROCESS [J].
DEMPSEY, WA .
INDUSTRIAL MARKETING MANAGEMENT, 1978, 7 (04) :257-267
[10]   RISK AND NEED-FOR-WORK PREMIUMS IN CONTRACTOR BIDDING [J].
DENEUFVILLE, R ;
KING, D .
JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT-ASCE, 1991, 117 (04) :659-673