Regulated river modeling for climate change impact assessment: The Missouri River

被引:27
作者
Hotchkiss, RH
Jorgensen, SF
Stone, MC
Fontaine, TA
机构
[1] Washington State Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Albrook Hydraul Lab, Pullman, WA 99164 USA
[2] Franson Noble & Associates, Amer Fork, UT 84003 USA
[3] S Dakota Sch Mines & Technol, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Rapid City, SD 57701 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN WATER RESOURCES ASSOCIATION | 2000年 / 36卷 / 02期
关键词
meteorology/climatology; modeling/statistics; simulation; surface water hydrology; reservoirs; Missouri River;
D O I
10.1111/j.1752-1688.2000.tb04275.x
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The Great Plains of the United States, drained primarily by the Missouri River, are very sensitive to shifts in climate. The six main stem dams on the Missouri River control more than one-half of the nearly 1.5 million square kilometer basin and can store three times the annual inflow from upstream. The dams are operated by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers using a Master Manual that describes system priorities and benefits. The complex operational rules were incorporated into the Soil and Water Assessment Tool computer model (SWAT). SWAT is a distributed parameter raintfall-runoff model capable of simulating the transpiration suppression effects of CO2 enrichment. The new reservoir algorithms were calibrated using a 25-year long historic record of basin climate and discharge records. Results demonstrate that it is possible to incorporate the operation of a highly regulated river system into a complex rainfall-runoff model. The algorithms were then tested using extreme climate scenarios indicative of a prolonged drought, a short drought, and a ten percent increase in basin-wide precipitation. It is apparent that the rules for operating the reservoirs will likely require modification if, for example, upper-basin precipitation were to increase only ten percent under changed climate conditions.
引用
收藏
页码:375 / 386
页数:12
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], CLIMATE CHANGE US WA
[2]  
Arnold J.G., 1995, SOIL WATER ASSESSMEN
[3]   Large area hydrologic modeling and assessment - Part 1: Model development [J].
Arnold, JG ;
Srinivasan, R ;
Muttiah, RS ;
Williams, JR .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN WATER RESOURCES ASSOCIATION, 1998, 34 (01) :73-89
[4]   CHANGING IDEAS IN HYDROLOGY - THE CASE OF PHYSICALLY-BASED MODELS [J].
BEVEN, K .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 1989, 105 (1-2) :157-172
[5]   AN OVERVIEW OF THE MINK STUDY [J].
CROSSON, PR ;
ROSENBERG, NJ .
CLIMATIC CHANGE, 1993, 24 (1-2) :159-173
[6]  
FONTAINE TA, 1996, AWRA ANN C LONG BEAC
[7]  
HURD B, 1996, EC EFFECTS CLIMATE C
[8]  
JORGENSEN SF, 1996, THESIS U NEBRASKA LI
[9]   MODELING THE EFFECTS OF CLIMATE-CHANGE ON WATER-RESOURCES - A REVIEW [J].
LEAVESLEY, GH .
CLIMATIC CHANGE, 1994, 28 (1-2) :159-177
[10]   A COMPARISON OF RAINFALL-RUNOFF MODELING TECHNIQUES ON SMALL UPLAND CATCHMENTS [J].
LOAGUE, KM ;
FREEZE, RA .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 1985, 21 (02) :229-248