Urinary pharmacokinetics of 11-nor-9-carboxy-Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol after controlled oral Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol administration

被引:28
作者
Gustafson, RA
Kim, I
Stout, PR
Klette, KL
George, MP
Moolchan, ET
Levine, B
Huestis, MA
机构
[1] NIDA, CDM, IRP, NIH, Baltimore, MD 21224 USA
[2] Aegis Sci Corp, Nashville, TN 37210 USA
[3] Navy Drug Screening Lab, Jacksonville, FL 32212 USA
[4] Quest Diagnost Inc, Schaumburg, IL 60173 USA
[5] Univ Maryland, Dept Epidemiol & Prevent Med, Baltimore, MD 21201 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1093/jat/28.3.160
中图分类号
O65 [分析化学];
学科分类号
070302 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Understanding the pharmacokinetics of orally administered cannabinoids is vitally important for optimizing therapeutic usage and to determine the impact of positive tests on drug detection programs. In this study, gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (limit of quantitation = 2.5 ng/mL) was used to monitor the excretion of total 11-nor-9-carboxy-Δ 9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THCCOOH) in 4381 urine voids collected from seven participants throughout a controlled clinical study of multiple oral doses of THC. The National Institute on Drug Abuse Institutional Review Board approved the study and each participant provided informed consent. Seven participants received 0, 0.39, 0.47, 7.5, and 14.8 mg THC/day for five days in this double blind, placebo-controlled, randomized protocol conducted on a closed research ward. No significant differences (P ≤ 0.05) were observed in mean time of maximum excretion rate, mean maximum excretion rate, and mean terminal elimination half-life (t1/2) between the four THC doses, with ranges of 67.4 to 94.9 h, 0.9 to 16.3 μg/h, and 44.2 to 64.0 h, respectively. Mean apparent elimination t1/2 of 24.1 ± 7.8 and 21.1 ± 4.3 h for the 7.5 and 14.8 mg/day doses, respectively, were calculated from the excretion rate curve prior to the last urine sample with a THCCOOH concentration ≥ 15 ng/mL. An average of only 2.9 ± 1.6%, 2.5 ± 2.7%, 1.5 ± 1.4%, and 0.6 ± 0.5% of the THC in the 0.39, 0.47, 7.5, and 14.8 mg/day doses, respectively, was excreted as THCCOOH in the urine over each 14-day dosing session. This study demonstrated that the terminal urinary elimination t1/2 of THCCOOH following oral administration was approximately two to three days for doses ranging from 0.39 to 14.8 mg/d. These data also demonstrate that the apparent urinary elimination t1/2 of THCCOOH prior to reaching a 15 ng/mL concentration is significantly shorter than the terminal urinary elimination t1/2. These controlled drug administration data should assist in the interpretation of urine cannabinoid results and provide clinicians with valuable information for future pharmacological studies.
引用
收藏
页码:160 / 167
页数:8
相关论文
共 36 条
[21]   METABOLISM OF TETRAHYDROCANNABINOL IN FREQUENT AND INFREQUENT MARIJUANA USERS [J].
KELLY, P ;
JONES, RT .
JOURNAL OF ANALYTICAL TOXICOLOGY, 1992, 16 (04) :228-235
[22]   FORENSIC ASPECTS OF THE METABOLISM AND EXCRETION OF CANNABINOIDS FOLLOWING ORAL INGESTION OF CANNABIS RESIN [J].
LAW, B ;
MASON, PA ;
MOFFAT, AC ;
GLEADLE, RI ;
KING, LJ .
JOURNAL OF PHARMACY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 1984, 36 (05) :289-294
[23]   Excretion of cannabinoids in urine after ingestion of cannabis seed oil [J].
Lehmann, T ;
Sager, F ;
Brenneisen, R .
JOURNAL OF ANALYTICAL TOXICOLOGY, 1997, 21 (05) :373-375
[24]   Evaluating the impact of hemp food consumption on workplace drug tests [J].
Leson, G ;
Pless, P ;
Grotenhermen, F ;
Kalant, H ;
ElSohly, MA .
JOURNAL OF ANALYTICAL TOXICOLOGY, 2001, 25 (08) :691-698
[25]   GC MS AND EMIT ANALYSES FOR DELTA-9 TETRAHYDROCANNABINOL METABOLITES IN PLASMA AND URINE OF HUMAN-SUBJECTS [J].
MCBURNEY, LJ ;
BOBBIE, BA ;
SEPP, LA .
JOURNAL OF ANALYTICAL TOXICOLOGY, 1986, 10 (02) :56-64
[26]   A TOTAL SYNTHESIS OF DL-DELTA1-TETRAHYDROCANNABINOL ACTIVE CONSTITUENT OF HASHISH [J].
MECHOULA.R ;
GAONI, Y .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 1965, 87 (14) :3273-+
[27]   Recent advances in cannabinoid research [J].
Mechoulam, R .
FORSCHENDE KOMPLEMENTARMEDIZIN, 1999, 6 :16-20
[28]   PLASMA DELTA-9-TETRAHYDROCANNABINOL CONCENTRATIONS AND CLINICAL EFFECTS AFTER ORAL AND INTRAVENOUS ADMINISTRATION AND SMOKING [J].
OHLSSON, A ;
LINDGREN, JE ;
WAHLEN, A ;
AGURELL, S ;
HOLLISTER, LE ;
GILLESPIE, HK .
CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 1980, 28 (03) :409-416
[29]  
Peat M.A., 1989, ADV ANAL TOXICOLOGY, V2, P186
[30]  
PEREZREY.M, 1973, CLIN PHARMACOL THER, V14, P48