Assessing global vegetation-climate feedbacks from observations

The feedback between global vegetation greenness and surface air temperature and precipitation is assessed using remote sensing observations of monthly fraction of photosynthetically active radiation (FPAR) for 1982 to 2000 with a 2.5 degrees grid resolution. Lead/lag correlations are used to infer vegetation-climate interactions. Furthermore, a statistical method is used to quantify the efficiency of vegetation feedback oil climate in the observations. This feedback analysis provides a first quantitative assessment of Global vegetation feedback oil climate. In northern mid- and high latitudes, vegetation variabilitv is found to be driven predominantly by temperature, in the meantime, vegetation also exerts a strong positive feedback on temperature with the feedback accounting for over 10%-25% of the total monthly temperature variance. The strongest positive feedback occurs in the boreal regions of southern Canada/northern United States, northern Europe, and southern Siberia, where the feedback efficiency exceeds 1 degrees C (0.1 FPAR)(-1). Over most of the Tropics and subtropics (outside the equatorial rain belt), vegetation is driven primarily by precipitation. However, little vegetation feedback is found on local precipitation when averaged year-round with the feedback explained variance usually accounting for less than 5% of the total precipitation variance. Nevertheless, in a few isolated small regions such as Northeast Brazil, East Africa. East Asia, and northern Australia, there appears to be sonic positive vegetation feedback on local precipitation, with the feedback efficiency over 1 cm month(-1) (0.1 FPAR)(-1). Further studies suggest a significant seasonal variation of the vegetation feedback in sonic regions. A preliminary analysis also seems to suggest an enhanced intensity of the vegetation feedback, especially oil precipitation, at longer time scales and over a larger grid box area. Limitations and implications of the assessment of vegetation feedback are also discussed. The assessed vegetation feedback is shown to be valuable for the evaluation of vegetation-climate feedback in coupled climate-vegetation models.