Simple approach in HACCP for evaluating the risk level of hazards using probability distributions

被引:16
作者
Ryu, Kyung [1 ]
Park, Ki-Hwan [2 ]
Yang, Ji-Young [3 ]
Bahk, Gyung-Jin [4 ]
机构
[1] Yeungnam Univ, Dept Food & Nutr, Gyeongbuk 712749, South Korea
[2] Chung Ang Univ, Dept Food Sci & Technol, Gyeonggi 456756, South Korea
[3] Pukyong Natl Univ, Div Food Sci & Biotechnol, Pusan 608737, South Korea
[4] Kunsan Natl Univ, Dept Food & Nutr, Gunsan 573701, Jeonbuk, South Korea
关键词
HACCP; Hazard analysis; Risk level; Probability distribution;
D O I
10.1016/j.foodcont.2012.07.042
中图分类号
TS2 [食品工业];
学科分类号
0832 ;
摘要
Hazard Analysis Critical Control Points (HACCP), internationally recognized as an effective way of controlling foodborne hazards, has been progressively applied for the benefit of the food industry. However, HACCP is a difficult principle to apply. Failure to perform hazard analysis could render the entire HACCP plan ineffective. This paper describes a new analytical method using simple beta and triangular probability distributions to improve the hazard analysis stage of the HACCP plan. Developed in Microsoft (R) Excel (a spreadsheet program), the model calculates the risk level for the probability, i.e., the likelihood of occurrence of a specific hazard by using background information and data. A pork-cutting procedure was included in a case study. At a 50% percentile value in probability distribution, the highest risk was a biological hazard (e.g., foodborne pathogens growth) in the packaging steps, at a probability of 5.5 x 10(-1). The lowest risk was a physical hazard in the packaging steps (e.g., foreign materials introduced by packaging damage), at a probability of 1.4 x 10(-3). Despite certain shortcomings, this model, with further improvements, could be expected to increase the effectiveness of HACCP in controlling food safety. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:459 / 462
页数:4
相关论文
共 16 条
[11]   Technical barriers to Hazard Analysis Critical Control Point (HACCP) [J].
Panisello, PJ ;
Quantick, PC .
FOOD CONTROL, 2001, 12 (03) :165-173
[12]   A simple, spreadsheet-based, food safety risk assessment tool [J].
Ross, T ;
Sumner, J .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FOOD MICROBIOLOGY, 2002, 77 (1-2) :39-53
[13]   Trapping the food safety performance of a small or medium-sized food company using a risk-based model.: The HYGRAM® system [J].
Tuominen, P ;
Hielm, S ;
Aarnisalo, K ;
Raaska, L ;
Maijala, R .
FOOD CONTROL, 2003, 14 (08) :573-578
[14]   An identification procedure for foodborne microbial hazards [J].
van Gerwen, SJC ;
de Wit, JC ;
Notermans, S ;
Zwietering, MH .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FOOD MICROBIOLOGY, 1997, 38 (01) :1-15
[15]  
Vose D., 2001, RISK ANAL QUANTITATI
[16]   Quantitative risk assessment: Is more complex always better? Simple is not stupid and complex is not always more correct [J].
Zwietering, Marcel H. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FOOD MICROBIOLOGY, 2009, 134 (1-2) :57-62