Ubiquitous selective constraints in the Drosophila genome revealed by a genome-wide interspecies comparison

被引:186
作者
Halligan, Daniel L. [1 ]
Keightley, Peter D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Edinburgh, Inst Evolut Biol, Edinburgh EH9 3JT, Midlothian, Scotland
基金
英国惠康基金;
关键词
D O I
10.1101/gr.5022906
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Non-coding DNA comprises similar to 80% of the euchromatic portion of the Drosophila melanogaster genome. Non-coding sequences are known to contain functionally important elements controlling gene expression, but the proportion of sites that are selectively constrained is still largely unknown. We have compared the complete D. melanogaster and Drosophila simulans genome sequences to estimate mean selective constraint ( the fraction of mutations that are eliminated by selection) in coding and non-coding DNA by standardizing to substitution rates in putatively unconstrained sequences. We show that constraint is positively correlated with intronic and intergenic sequence length and is generally remarkably strong in non-coding DNA, implying that more than half of all point mutations in the Drosophila genome are deleterious. This fraction is also likely to be an underestimate if many substitutions in non-coding DNA are adaptively driven to fixation. We also show that substitutions in long introns and intergenic sequences are clustered, such that there is an excess of substitutions < 8 bp apart and a deficit farther apart. These results suggest that there are blocks of constrained nucleotides, presumably involved in gene expression control, that are concentrated in long non-coding sequences. Furthermore, we infer that there is more than three times as much functional non-coding DNA as protein-coding DNA in the Drosophila genome. Most deleterious mutations therefore occur in non-coding DNA, and these may make an important contribution to a wide variety of evolutionary processes.
引用
收藏
页码:875 / 884
页数:10
相关论文
共 57 条
[1]  
AKASHI H, 1995, GENETICS, V139, P1067
[2]  
Akashi H, 1996, GENETICS, V144, P1297
[3]   Adaptive evolution of non-coding DNA in Drosophila [J].
Andolfatto, P .
NATURE, 2005, 437 (7062) :1149-1152
[4]  
[Anonymous], GENOME BIOL
[5]   Analysis of conserved noncoding DNA in Drosophila reveals similar constraints in intergenic and intronic sequences [J].
Bergman, CM ;
Kreitman, M .
GENOME RESEARCH, 2001, 11 (08) :1335-1345
[6]   Patterns of insertion and deletion in contrasting chromatin domains [J].
Blumenstiel, JP ;
Hartl, DL ;
Lozovsky, ER .
MOLECULAR BIOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2002, 19 (12) :2211-2225
[7]   MAVID: Constrained ancestral alignment of multiple sequences [J].
Bray, N ;
Pachter, L .
GENOME RESEARCH, 2004, 14 (04) :693-699
[8]   Genetic recombination - Intron size and natural selection [J].
Carvalho, AB ;
Clark, AG .
NATURE, 1999, 401 (6751) :344-344
[9]   Some evolutionary consequences of deleterious mutations [J].
Charlesworth, B ;
Charlesworth, D .
GENETICA, 1998, 102-3 (0) :3-19
[10]   Intragenic Hill-Robertson interference influences selection intensity on synonymous mutations in Drosophila [J].
Comeron, JM ;
Guthrie, TB .
MOLECULAR BIOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2005, 22 (12) :2519-2530