MR imaging and MR spectroscopic imaging in the pre-treatment evaluation of prostate cancer (Publication with Expression of Concern)

被引:107
作者
Hricak, H [1 ]
机构
[1] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Radiol, New York, NY 10021 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1259/bjr/11253478
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (1H MRSI) are emerging as the most sensitive tools for the non-invasive, anatomic and metabolic evaluation of prostate cancer. This article reviews the current applications of MRI and 1H MRSI in clinical practice and discusses the promise of these modalities for improving prostate cancer management. MRI demonstrates zonal anatomy with excellent contrast resolution and can reveal tumours in areas not routinely sampled on biopsy and not palpable on digital rectal examination. In addition, MR images allow assessment of local extent (including extracapsular extension and seminal vesicle invasion) and thus can assist in local staging while providing surgeons and radiation therapists with a visual road-map for treatment planning. The addition of IH MRSI to MRI can improve prostate cancer detection and assessment of tumour volume; it also contributes indirectly to improved local staging. In addition, IH MRSI metabolic and volumetric data correlate with pathological Gleason grade and thus may offer a non-invasive means to better predict prostate cancer aggressiveness. Combined MRI/1H MRSI is currently of greatest value for high-risk patients. With greater understanding of the relationship between spectroscopic data and tumour biology, it may become possible to use MRI/1H MRSI to achieve more precise stratification of patients in clinical trials, to monitor the progress of patients who select watchful waiting or minimally aggressive cancer therapies, and to guide and assess emerging local prostate cancer therapies.
引用
收藏
页码:S103 / S111
页数:9
相关论文
共 57 条
[1]  
AMERICAN JOINT COMMITTEE ON CANCER, 2002, AJCC CANC STAG MAN, P309
[2]  
Barentsz JO, 1999, J MAGN RESON IMAGING, V10, P295, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1522-2586(199909)10:3<295::AID-JMRI10>3.0.CO
[3]  
2-Z
[4]   Lymph node metastases: Safety and effectiveness of MR imaging with ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide particles - Initial clinical experience [J].
Bellin, MF ;
Roy, C ;
Kinkel, K ;
Thoumas, D ;
Zaim, S ;
Vanel, D ;
Tuchmann, C ;
Richard, F ;
Jacqmin, D ;
Delcourt, A ;
Challier, E ;
Lebret, T ;
Cluzel, P .
RADIOLOGY, 1998, 207 (03) :799-808
[5]   Patients with a history of elevated prostate-specific antigen levels and negative transrectal US-guided quadrant or sextant biopsy results: Value of MR imaging [J].
Beyersdorff, D ;
Taupitz, M ;
Winkelmann, B ;
Fischer, T ;
Lenk, S ;
Loening, SA ;
Hamm, B .
RADIOLOGY, 2002, 224 (03) :701-706
[6]   NMR CHEMICAL-SHIFT IMAGING IN 3 DIMENSIONS [J].
BROWN, TR ;
KINCAID, BM ;
UGURBIL, K .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 1982, 79 (11) :3523-3526
[7]   Pretreatment evaluation of prostate cancer:: Role of MR imaging and 1H MR spectroscopy [J].
Claus, FG ;
Hricak, H ;
Hattery, RR .
RADIOGRAPHICS, 2004, 24 :S167-S180
[8]   Urinary continence after radical retropubic prostatectomy: Relationship with membranous urethral length on preoperative endorectal magnetic resonance imaging [J].
Coakley, FV ;
Eberhardt, S ;
Kattan, MW ;
Wei, DC ;
Scardino, PT ;
Hricak, H .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2002, 168 (03) :1032-1035
[9]   Blood loss during radical retropubic prostatectomy: Relationship to morphologic features on preoperative endorectal magnetic resonance imaging [J].
Coakley, FV ;
Eberhardt, S ;
Wei, DC ;
Wasserman, ES ;
Heinze, SBJ ;
Scardino, PT ;
Hricak, H .
UROLOGY, 2002, 59 (06) :884-888
[10]   Correlation between Gleason score of needle biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimen: Accuracy and clinical implications [J].
Cookson, MS ;
Fleshner, NE ;
Soloway, SM ;
Fair, WR .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1997, 157 (02) :559-562