Epidemiological designs for vaccine safety assessment: Methods and pitfalls

被引:9
作者
Andrews, Nick [1 ]
机构
[1] Hlth Protect Agcy, Stat Modelling & Econ Dept, Hlth Protect Serv, London NW9 5EQ, England
关键词
Vaccine safety; Case control; Cohort; Self-controlled case series; Post-licensure; Methodology; CASE SERIES; CAUSAL ASSOCIATION; AUTISM; MEASLES; MUMPS; MMR;
D O I
10.1016/j.biologicals.2011.08.010
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Three commonly used designs for vaccine safety assessment post licensure are cohort, case-control and self-controlled case series. These methods are often used with routine health databases and immunisation registries. This paper considers the issues that may arise when designing an epidemiological study, such as understanding the vaccine safety question, case definition and finding, limitations of data sources, uncontrolled confounding, and pitfalls that apply to the individual designs. The example of MMR and autism, where all three designs have been used, is presented to help consider these issues. (C) 2011 The International Alliance for Biological Standardization. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:389 / 392
页数:4
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]   Does oral polio vaccine cause intussusception in infants? Evidence from a sequence of three self-controlled cases series studies in the united kingdom [J].
Andrews, N ;
Miller, E ;
Waight, P ;
Farrington, P ;
Crowcroft, N ;
Stowe, J ;
Taylor, B .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2001, 17 (08) :701-706
[2]   The Brighton Collaboration: addressing the need for standardized case definitions of adverse events following immunization (AEFI) [J].
Bonhoeffer, J ;
Kohl, K ;
Chen, R ;
Duclos, P ;
Heijbel, H ;
Heininger, U ;
Jefferson, T ;
Loupi, E .
VACCINE, 2002, 21 (3-4) :298-302
[3]   Case series analysis for censored, perturbed, or curtailed post-event exposures [J].
Farrington, C. Paddy ;
Whitaker, Heather J. ;
Hocine, Mounia N. .
BIOSTATISTICS, 2009, 10 (01) :3-16
[4]   Control without separate controls: evaluation of vaccine safety using case-only methods [J].
Farrington, CP .
VACCINE, 2004, 22 (15-16) :2064-2070
[5]   RELATIVE INCIDENCE ESTIMATION FROM CASE SERIES FOR VACCINE SAFETY EVALUATION [J].
FARRINGTON, CP .
BIOMETRICS, 1995, 51 (01) :228-235
[6]  
Farrington CP, 1998, AM J EPIDEMIOL, V147, P93
[7]   MMR and autism: further evidence against a causal association [J].
Farrington, CP ;
Miller, E ;
Taylor, B .
VACCINE, 2001, 19 (27) :3632-3635
[8]   CONFOUNDING IN STUDIES OF ADVERSE REACTIONS TO VACCINES [J].
FINE, PEM ;
CHEN, RT .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1992, 136 (02) :121-135
[9]   Four different study designs to evaluate vaccine safety were equally validated with contrasting limitations [J].
Glanz, Jason M. ;
McClure, David L. ;
Xu, Stanley ;
Hambidge, Simon J. ;
Lee, Martin ;
Kolczak, Margarette S. ;
Kleinman, Ken ;
Mullooly, John P. ;
France, Eric K. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2006, 59 (08) :808-818
[10]   A population-based study of measles, mumps, and rubella vaccination and autism [J].
Madsen, KM ;
Hviid, A ;
Vestergaard, M ;
Schendel, D ;
Wohlfahrt, J ;
Thorsen, P ;
Olsen, J ;
Melbye, M .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2002, 347 (19) :1477-1482