Comparison of an inhomogeneous orthotropic and isotropic material models used for FE analyses

被引:106
作者
Baca, Vaclav [1 ]
Horak, Zdenek [2 ]
Mikulenka, Petr [2 ]
Dzupa, Valer [3 ]
机构
[1] Charles Univ Prague, Dept Anat, Fac Med 3, Prague, Czech Republic
[2] Czech Tech Univ, Fac Mech Engn, Biomech Lab, CR-16635 Prague, Czech Republic
[3] Charles Univ Prague, Dept Orthopaed & Traumatol, Fac Med 3, Prague, Czech Republic
关键词
finite element; proximal femur; cortical and cancellous bone; material properties;
D O I
10.1016/j.medengphy.2007.12.009
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 [生物医学工程];
摘要
Finite element (FE) analysis has been widely used to study the behaviour of bone or implants in many clinical applications. One of the main factors in analyses is the realistic behaviour of the bone model, because the behaviour of the bone is strongly dependent on a realistic bone material property assignment. The objective of this study was to compare isotropic and orthotropic inhomogeneous material models used for FE analyses of the "global" proximal femur and "small" specimens of the bone (cancellous and cortical). Our hypothesis was that realistic material property assignment (orthotropy) is very important for the FE analyses of small bone specimens, whereas in global FE analyses of the proximal femur, this assignment can be omitted, if the inhomogeneous material model was used. The three-dimensional geometry of the "global" proximal femur was reconstructed using CT scans of a cadaveric femur. This model was implemented into an FE simulation tool and various bone material properties, dependant on bone density, were assigned to each element in the models. The "small" specimens of cortical and cancellous bone were created in the same way as the model of the proximal femur. The results obtained from FE analyses support our above described hypothesis. (C) 2007 IPEM. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:924 / 930
页数:7
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]
The course of osteons in the compact bone of the human proximal femur with clinical and biomechanical significance [J].
Baca, Vaclav ;
Kachlik, David ;
Horak, Zdenek ;
Stingl, Josef .
SURGICAL AND RADIOLOGIC ANATOMY, 2007, 29 (03) :201-207
[2]
Benninghoff A, 1925, VERH ANAT GES, V34, P189
[3]
THE 3-DIMENSIONAL ANATOMY OF HAVERSIAN SYSTEMS [J].
COHEN, J ;
HARRIS, WH .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1958, 40 (02) :419-434
[4]
Hert J, 1993, Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech, V60, P199
[5]
HERT J, 1994, BONE, V15, P269
[6]
Cancellous bone mechanical properties from normals and patients with hip fractures differ on the structure level, not on the bone hard tissue level [J].
Homminga, J ;
McCreadie, BR ;
Ciarelli, TE ;
Weinans, H ;
Goldstein, SA ;
Huiskes, R .
BONE, 2002, 30 (05) :759-764
[7]
Comparison of in situ and in vitro CT scan-based finite element model predictions of proximal femoral fracture load [J].
Keyak, JH ;
Falkinstein, Y .
MEDICAL ENGINEERING & PHYSICS, 2003, 25 (09) :781-787
[8]
Applications of an anisotropic parameter to cortical bone [J].
Kohles, SS .
JOURNAL OF MATERIALS SCIENCE-MATERIALS IN MEDICINE, 2000, 11 (04) :261-265
[9]
Elastic properties of cancellous bone derived from finite element models of parameterized microstructure cells [J].
Kowalczyk, P .
JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 2003, 36 (07) :961-972
[10]
NEDOMA J, 2006, BIOMECHANIKA LIDSKEH