Intraoperative cell salvage in radical retropubic prostatectomy

被引:54
作者
Gray, CL
Amling, CL
Polston, GR
Powell, CR
Kane, CJ
机构
[1] USN, Med Ctr, KCA, Clin Invest Dept, San Diego, CA 92134 USA
[2] USN, Ctr Med, Dept Urol, San Diego, CA 92134 USA
[3] USN, Ctr Med, Dept Anesthesiol, San Diego, CA 92134 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0090-4295(01)01365-6
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives. To investigate the efficacy and safety of intraoperative cell salvage with autotransfusion using leukocyte reduction filters in patients undergoing radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP). Methods. Between September 1996 and March 1999, 62 patients (age range 48 to 70 years) with clinically localized prostate cancer underwent RRP with intraoperative cell salvage as the sole blood management technique. Salvaged blood was passed through a leukocyte reduction filter before autotransfusion. The 62 cell salvage patients were compared with a cohort who predonated 1 to 3 U autologous blood (n = 101). The estimated blood loss, preoperative and postoperative hematocrit, need for homologous transfusion, and biochemical recurrence rates were compared between the two groups. The progression-free survival rates were compared using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results. No difference was found in preoperative prostate-specific antigen level, pathologic stage, or estimated blood loss between the cell salvage and autologous predonation groups. The preoperative and postoperative hernatocrit levels were higher in the cell salvage group (42.7% versus 39.6% and 31.3% versus 27.9%, respectively; P <0.001 for each). The homologous transfusion rates were lower in the cell salvage group (3% versus 14%, P = 0.04). The incidence of progression-free survival (prostate-specific antigen level 0.4 ng/mL or greater) was no different between the groups (P = 0.41). Conclusions. Intraoperative cell salvage with autotransfusion using leukocyte reduction filters in RRP results in higher perioperative hernatocrit levels and low homologous transfusion rates and eliminates the need for autologous predonation. Cell salvage does not appear to be associated with an increased risk of early biochemical progression after RRP. (C) 2001, Elsevier Science Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:740 / 745
页数:6
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   Defining prostate specific antigen progression after radical prostatectomy: What is the most appropriate cut point? [J].
Amling, CL ;
Bergstralh, EJ ;
Blute, ML ;
Slezak, JM ;
Zincke, H .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2001, 165 (04) :1146-1151
[2]   EARLY COMPLICATIONS OF CONTEMPORARY ANATOMICAL RADICAL RETROPUBIC PROSTATECTOMY [J].
ANDRIOLE, GL ;
SMITH, DS ;
RAO, G ;
GOODNOUGH, L ;
CATALONA, WJ .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1994, 152 (05) :1858-1860
[3]   THE SAFETY OF PREOPERATIVE AUTOLOGOUS BLOOD DONATION IN THE NONHOSPITAL SETTING [J].
AUBUCHON, JP ;
POPOVSKY, MA .
TRANSFUSION, 1991, 31 (06) :513-517
[4]  
Chiusano Michael A., 1996, Journal of the American Osteopathic Association, V96, P160
[5]  
Das A, 1998, Tech Urol, V4, P131
[6]   The potential for reintroduction of tumor cells during intraoperative blood salvage: Reduction of risk with use of the RC-400 leukocyte depletion filter [J].
Edelman, MJ ;
Potter, P ;
Mahaffey, KG ;
Frink, R ;
Leidich, RB .
UROLOGY, 1996, 47 (02) :179-181
[7]   PERIOPERATIVE BLOOD-TRANSFUSION IN RELATION TO TUMOR RECURRENCE AND DEATH AFTER SURGERY FOR PROSTATIC-CANCER [J].
EICKHOFF, JH ;
GOTE, H ;
BAECK, J .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1991, 68 (06) :608-611
[8]   RADICAL RETROPUBIC PROSTATECTOMY - LIMITED BENEFIT OF AUTOLOGOUS BLOOD DONATION [J].
GOAD, JR ;
EASTHAM, JA ;
FITZGERALD, KB ;
KATTAN, MW ;
COLLINI, MP ;
YAWN, DH ;
SCARDINO, PT .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1995, 154 (06) :2103-2109
[9]   Autologous blood donation prior to anatomical radical retropubic prostatectomy: Is it necessary? [J].
Goh, M ;
Kleer, CG ;
Kielczewski, P ;
Wojno, KJ ;
Kim, K ;
Oesterling, JE .
UROLOGY, 1997, 49 (04) :569-573
[10]   Medical progress - Transfusion medicine (First of two parts) - Blood transfusion [J].
Goodnough, LT ;
Brecher, ME ;
Kanter, MH ;
AuBuchon, JP .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1999, 340 (06) :438-447