Urinary tract abnormalities: Initial experience with multi-detector row CT urography

被引:203
作者
Caoili, EM
Cohan, RH
Korobkin, M
Platt, JF
Francis, IR
Faerber, GJ
Montie, JE
Ellis, JH
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Ctr Med, Dept Radiol, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[2] Univ Michigan, Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Urol Surg Sect, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
关键词
bladder; CT; computed tomography (CT); technology; kidney; abnormalities; ureter; urography;
D O I
10.1148/radiol.2222010667
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
PURPOSE: To evaluate multi-detector row computed tomographic (CT) urography for detection of urinary tract abnormalities. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty-five patients referred from the urology service, in whom urinary tract abnormalities were strongly suspected, underwent multi-detector row CT urography. The technique included unenhanced, nephrographic, compression, and excretory-phase images through the abdomen and pelvis. Transverse images and three-dimensional reformations were reviewed by one of two radiologists. Findings were retrospectively compared with results of urinalysis, cystoscopy and/or ureteroscopy, and/or surgery. RESULTS: Multi-detector row CT urography depicted many clinically diagnosed urinary tract abnormalities, including 15 of 16 uroepithelial malignancies, five congenital anomalies, five urinary tract calculi, and 18 calyceal and/or papillary, 30 renal pelvic and/or ureteral, and 25 bladder abnormalities. All abnormalities were detected on transverse images. These abnormalities included diffuse urothelial wall thickening in four patients (three of whom had transitional cell carcinoma) a renal, abscess, a colovesical fistula, and incidentally detected extrarenal disease (a liver mass, hepatic metastases, lymph node metastases, an aortic dissection, and a pheochromocytoma; each of these findings was seen in one patient). CONCLUSION: Multi-detector row CT urography is a useful method for detecting urinary tract abnormalities.
引用
收藏
页码:353 / 360
页数:8
相关论文
共 17 条
[11]   RENAL CALCULI - SENSITIVITY FOR DETECTION WITH US [J].
MIDDLETON, WD ;
DODDS, WJ ;
LAWSON, TL ;
FOLEY, WD .
RADIOLOGY, 1988, 167 (01) :239-244
[12]   STRATEGIES FOR ASYMPTOMATIC MICROSCOPIC HEMATURIA - A PROSPECTIVE-STUDY OF 1,034 PATIENTS [J].
MURAKAMI, S ;
IGARASHI, T ;
HARA, S ;
SHIMAZAKI, J .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1990, 144 (01) :99-101
[13]   A comparison of noncontrast computerized tomography with excretory urography in the assessment of acute flank pain [J].
Niall, O ;
Russell, J ;
MacGregor, R ;
Duncan, H ;
Mullins, J .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1999, 161 (02) :534-537
[14]   ACUTE FLANK PAIN - COMPARISON OF NON-CONTRAST-ENHANCED CT AND INTRAVENOUS UROGRAPHY [J].
SMITH, RC ;
ROSENFIELD, AT ;
CHOE, KA ;
ESSENMACHER, KR ;
VERGA, M ;
GLICKMAN, MG ;
LANGE, RC .
RADIOLOGY, 1995, 194 (03) :789-794
[15]   Diagnosis of acute flank pain: Value of unenhanced helical CT [J].
Smith, RC ;
Verga, M ;
McCarthy, S ;
Rosenfield, AT .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1996, 166 (01) :97-101
[16]   Radiologic investigation of renal colic: Unenhanced helical CT compared with excretory urography [J].
Sourtzis, S ;
Thibeau, JF ;
Damry, N ;
Raslan, A ;
Vandendris, M ;
Bellemans, M .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1999, 172 (06) :1491-1494
[17]   DETECTION OF RENAL MASSES - SENSITIVITIES AND SPECIFICITIES OF EXCRETORY UROGRAPHY-LINEAR TOMOGRAPHY, ULTRASOUND, AND CT [J].
WARSHAUER, DM ;
MCCARTHY, SM ;
STREET, L ;
BOOKBINDER, MJ ;
GLICKMAN, MG ;
RICHTER, J ;
HAMMERS, L ;
TAYLOR, C ;
ROSENFIELD, AT .
RADIOLOGY, 1988, 169 (02) :363-365