Mild ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization: one perspective from the USA

被引:10
作者
Baker, Valerie L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Sch Med, Div Reprod Endocrinol & Infertil, Dept Obstet & Gynecol,Stanford Fertil & Reprod Me, Palo Alto, CA 94304 USA
关键词
Assisted reproductive technology; In vitro fertilization; Mild ovarian stimulation; ASSISTED REPRODUCTIVE TECHNOLOGY; UNITED-STATES; IVF; SOCIETY; OUTCOMES; OOCYTES; EMBRYO; RATES; COST;
D O I
10.1007/s10815-013-9946-8
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 [遗传学];
摘要
To provide a perspective regarding mild ovarian stimulation, taking into account particular issues relevant in the United States Literature review and editorial commentary Mild ovarian stimulation for IVF has some proven and some theoretical advantages over conventional stimulation, such as lower risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome and lower cost per fresh IVF cycle. However, cumulative live birth rate, including transfers from fresh and frozen embryos, is likely to be lower with mild stimulation. The cost-effectiveness of mild stimulation IVF in the United States has not been established. Mild ovarian stimulation is an appropriate option to consider for certain patient groups or based on patient preference. However, significant potential disadvantages limit its widespread acceptability for patients in the United States at this time.
引用
收藏
页码:197 / 202
页数:6
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]
Milder ovarian stimulation for in-vitro fertilization reduces aneuploidy in the human preimplantation embryo:: a randomized controlled trial [J].
Baart, Esther B. ;
Martini, Elena ;
Eijkemans, Marinus J. ;
Van Opstal, Diane ;
Beckers, Nicole G. M. ;
Verhoeff, Arie ;
Macklon, Nicolas S. ;
Fauser, Bart C. J. M. .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2007, 22 (04) :980-988
[2]
ASSOCIATION BETWEEN MULTIPLE CORPORA LUTEA AND BIRTHWEIGHT AMONG SINGLETONS FROM IN VITRO FERTILIZATION: ANALYSIS USING SOCIETY FOR ASSISTED REPRODUCTIVE TECHNOLOGY CLINICAL OUTCOMES REPORTING SYSTEM [J].
Baker, V. L. ;
Brown, M. B. ;
Luke, B. ;
Conrad, K. P. .
FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2012, 98 (03) :S16-S16
[3]
Economic cost for implementation of the US Food and Drug Administration's Code of Federal Regulations Title 21, Part 1271 in an egg donor program [J].
Baker, Valerie L. ;
Gvakharia, Marina O. ;
Rone, Heather M. ;
Manalad, James R. ;
Adamson, David .
FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2008, 90 (03) :537-545
[4]
Factors affecting success rates in two concurrent clinical IVF trials: an examination of potential explanations for the difference in pregnancy rates between the United States and Europe [J].
Baker, Valerie L. ;
Jones, Clarence E. ;
Cometti, Barbara ;
Hoehler, Fred ;
Salle, Bruno ;
Urbancsek, Janos ;
Soules, Michael R. .
FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2010, 94 (04) :1287-1291
[5]
Can at-home semi-quantitative pregnancy tests serve as a replacement for clinical follow-up of medical abortion? A US study [J].
Blum, Jennifer ;
Shochet, Tara ;
Lynd, Kelsey ;
Lichtenberg, E. Steve ;
Fischer, Dick ;
Arnesen, Michelle ;
Winikoff, Beverly ;
Blumenthal, Paul D. .
CONTRACEPTION, 2012, 86 (06) :757-762
[6]
Individualised controlled ovarian stimulation (iCOS): maximising success rates for assisted reproductive technology patients [J].
Bosch, Ernesto ;
Ezcurra, Diego .
REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY AND ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2011, 9
[7]
Conrad KP, 2012, AM J PHYSL REGUL INT
[8]
Reproductive biology and IVF: ovarian stimulation and endometrial receptivity [J].
Devroey, P ;
Bourgain, C ;
Macklon, NS ;
Fauser, BCJM .
TRENDS IN ENDOCRINOLOGY AND METABOLISM, 2004, 15 (02) :84-90
[9]
Cancer and fertility: strategies to preserve fertility [J].
Diedrich, K. ;
Fauser, B. C. J. M. ;
Devroey, P. .
REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE, 2011, 22 (03) :232-248
[10]
Mild ovarian stimulation for IVF: 10 years later [J].
Fauser, Bart C. J. M. ;
Nargund, Geeta ;
Andersen, Anders Nyboe ;
Norman, Robert ;
Tarlatzis, Basil ;
Boivin, Jacky ;
Ledger, William .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2010, 25 (11) :2678-2684