Comprehensive long-term outcome of best drug treatment with or without add-on vagus nerve stimulation for epilepsy: A retrospective matched pairs case-control study
被引:17
作者:
Hoppe, Christian
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Univ Bonn, Med Ctr, Dept Epileptol, D-53105 Bonn, GermanyUniv Bonn, Med Ctr, Dept Epileptol, D-53105 Bonn, Germany
Hoppe, Christian
[1
]
Wagner, Lena
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Univ Bonn, Med Ctr, Dept Epileptol, D-53105 Bonn, GermanyUniv Bonn, Med Ctr, Dept Epileptol, D-53105 Bonn, Germany
Wagner, Lena
[1
]
Hoffmann, Judith M.
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Univ Bonn, Med Ctr, Dept Epileptol, D-53105 Bonn, GermanyUniv Bonn, Med Ctr, Dept Epileptol, D-53105 Bonn, Germany
Hoffmann, Judith M.
[1
]
von Lehe, Marec
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Univ Bonn, Med Ctr, Dept Neurosurg, D-53105 Bonn, GermanyUniv Bonn, Med Ctr, Dept Epileptol, D-53105 Bonn, Germany
von Lehe, Marec
[2
]
Elger, Christian E.
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Univ Bonn, Med Ctr, Dept Epileptol, D-53105 Bonn, GermanyUniv Bonn, Med Ctr, Dept Epileptol, D-53105 Bonn, Germany
Elger, Christian E.
[1
]
机构:
[1] Univ Bonn, Med Ctr, Dept Epileptol, D-53105 Bonn, Germany
[2] Univ Bonn, Med Ctr, Dept Neurosurg, D-53105 Bonn, Germany
来源:
SEIZURE-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF EPILEPSY
|
2013年
/
22卷
/
02期
Purpose: In the treatment of epilepsy, the recommendation to add vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) to the best available drug therapy (BDT) mostly relies on uncontrolled studies which provide limited information about VNS-specific benefits. We report findings from a retrospective matched pairs case-control study comparing the long-term (>2 years) outcomes of BDT with or without VNS. Methods: Included were adult patients with therapy-refractory epilepsy who had undergone the pre-surgical work-up (baseline) and subsequently received BDT with VNS (BDT + VNS) or BDT alone (BDT group). Patients were matched in pairs for age, gender and follow-up. Health outcomes were assessed at least 24 months after the baseline by comprehensive postal surveys and included established psychometric scales. Results: We obtained data from 20 matched pairs of case and control patients. In both groups, seizures, health-related quality of life and mood improved over time. More BDT patients experienced a complete cessation of "major" seizures (12/20 vs. 4/20) whereas, in non-seizure free patients, BDT + VNS patients showed better seizure frequency reduction (>50% reduction: 12/19 vs. 7/16). BDT + VNS patients experienced equal drug related and additional VNS related side effects. No clinically relevant effect of VNS treatment was found on any psychological/psychosocial outcome measure. Conclusion: This retrospective study provided no positive evidence for therapeutic benefits of adding VNS to BDT. The follow-up health status of BDT + VNS patients was slightly worse than in patients receiving BDT alone. Despite minor group differences at baseline the two patient groups who had failed presurgical evaluation were comparable. Therapeutic improvements during long-term BDT alone are often underestimated resulting in a misattribution of positive changes to VNS in uncontrolled studies and reviews. Currently, there is no incontrovertible evidence for the clinical effectiveness of adding VNS to BDT. (C) 2012 British Epilepsy Association. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机构:
Med Coll Wisconsin, Dept Neurol, Milwaukee, WI 53226 USAUniv Washington, Harborview Med Ctr, Reg Epilepsy Ctr, Dept Neurol,Sch Med, Seattle, WA 98104 USA
机构:
Med Coll Wisconsin, Dept Neurol, Milwaukee, WI 53226 USAUniv Washington, Harborview Med Ctr, Reg Epilepsy Ctr, Dept Neurol,Sch Med, Seattle, WA 98104 USA