Using systematic reviews in clinical education

被引:21
作者
Badgett, RG [1 ]
OKeefe, M [1 ]
Henderson, MC [1 ]
机构
[1] AUDIE L MURPHY MEM VET ADM MED CTR, SAN ANTONIO, TX 78284 USA
关键词
D O I
10.7326/0003-4819-126-11-199706010-00006
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Traditional educational methods change clinical practice only with considerable effort and difficulty. In particular, the teaching of critical appraisal in the setting of journal clubs does not increase the amount of medical research read by trainees. Experiential learning theory, corroborated by the success of problem-based learning, encourages us to link learning to the numerous medical questions that physicians generate while providing patient care. Systematic reviews can link these questions with the results of research that would otherwise be difficult to locate, read, and appraise. Systematic reviews are a uniquely powerful mechanism for teaching, and they offer teachers a new opportunity to model rational and effective use of information. Systematic reviews should be made available at clinical sites for use during ''teachable moments.'' Resistance to the use of systematic reviews can be reduced by using existing journal clubs to teach about the strengths and limitations of these reviews. The point that systematic reviews are meant to assist, not replace, clinical decision making deserves emphasis in such teaching.
引用
收藏
页码:886 / 891
页数:6
相关论文
共 46 条
[21]   DO CORTICOSTEROIDS REDUCE MORTALITY FROM ALCOHOLIC HEPATITIS - A METAANALYSIS OF THE RANDOMIZED TRIALS [J].
IMPERIALE, TF ;
MCCULLOUGH, AJ .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1990, 113 (04) :299-307
[22]  
KING PD, 1996, ACP J CLUB, V124, P13
[23]  
Kolb D. A., 1984, Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development
[24]   A CONTROLLED TRIAL OF A SEMINAR TO IMPROVE MEDICAL-STUDENT ATTITUDES TOWARD, KNOWLEDGE ABOUT, AND USE OF THE MEDICAL LITERATURE [J].
LANDRY, FJ ;
PANGARO, L ;
KROENKE, K ;
LUCEY, C ;
HERBERS, J .
JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1994, 9 (08) :436-439
[25]   STEROID CONTROVERSY IN SEPSIS AND SEPTIC SHOCK - A METAANALYSIS [J].
LEFERING, R ;
NEUGEBAUER, EAM .
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 1995, 23 (07) :1294-1303
[26]   IMPACT OF A MEDICAL JOURNAL CLUB ON HOUSE-STAFF READING HABITS, KNOWLEDGE, AND CRITICAL-APPRAISAL SKILLS - A RANDOMIZED CONTROL TRIAL [J].
LINZER, M ;
BROWN, JT ;
FRAZIER, LM ;
DELONG, ER ;
SIEGEL, WC .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1988, 260 (17) :2537-2541
[27]   QUALITATIVE ASSESSMENT OF STUDIES INCLUDED IN A METAANALYSIS - DES AND THE RISK OF PREGNANCY LOSS [J].
MACARTHUR, C ;
FORAN, PJ ;
BAILAR, JC .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1995, 48 (06) :739-747
[28]   ASSOCIATION OF ADRENOCORTICOSTEROID THERAPY AND PEPTIC-ULCER DISEASE [J].
MESSER, J ;
REITMAN, D ;
SACKS, HS ;
SMITH, H ;
CHALMERS, TC .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1983, 309 (01) :21-24
[29]   PREVALENCE, FORMAT, AND EFFICACY IN PM-AND-R [J].
MOBERGWOLFF, EA ;
KOSASIH, JB .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE & REHABILITATION, 1995, 74 (03) :224-229
[30]   THE MEDICAL REVIEW ARTICLE - STATE OF THE SCIENCE [J].
MULROW, CD .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1987, 106 (03) :485-488