A New Stand-Alone Cervical Anterior Interbody Fusion Device Biomechanical Comparison With Established Anterior Cervical Fixation Devices

被引:202
作者
Scholz, Matti [1 ]
Reyes, Phillip M. [2 ]
Schleicher, Philipp [1 ]
Sawa, Anna G. U. [2 ]
Baek, Seungwon [2 ]
Kandziora, Frank [1 ]
Marciano, Frederick F. [3 ]
Crawford, Neil R. [2 ]
机构
[1] Trauma Clin Frankfurt Main, Ctr Spinesurg & Neurotraumatol, D-60389 Frankfurt, Germany
[2] Barrow Neurol Inst, Spinal Biomech Res Lab, Phoenix, AZ 85013 USA
[3] Barrow Neurol Inst, Div Neurol Surg, Phoenix, AZ 85013 USA
关键词
anterior cervical fusion; stand alone; cervical fixation; biomechanical evaluation; NEUTRAL ZONE; FOLLOW-UP; SPINE;
D O I
10.1097/BRS.0b013e31818ff9c4
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
100204 [神经病学];
摘要
Study Design. A new anchored spacer - a low-profile cervical interbody fusion cage with integrated anterior fixation - was compared biomechanically to established anterior cervical devices. Objective. To evaluate the fixation properties of the new stand-alone device and compare these properties with established fixation methods. The hypothesis is that the new device will provide stability comparable to that provided by an anterior cervical cage when supplemented with an anterior plate. Summary of Background Data. It is accepted that the use of anterior cervical plating increases the chance of achieving a solid fusion. However, its use may be associated with an increase in operation time and a higher postoperative morbidity caused by a larger anterior approach and disruption of the anterior musculature. This dilemma has led to the development of a new, low profile stand-alone cervical anterior cage device with integrated screw fixation. Methods. Twenty-four human cadaveric C4-C7 cervical spines were loaded nondestructively with pure moments in a nonconstraining testing apparatus to induce flexion, extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation while angular motion was measured optoelectronically. The specimens were tested: 1. Intact (N = 24). 2. After discectomy and anterior stabilization. a. Interbody cage + locking plate (N = 8). b. Interbody cage + dynamic plate (N = 8). c. Anchored spacer (N = 8). 3. After ventral plate removal of group 2a and 2b (N = 16). Results. All fixation techniques decreased range of motion (ROM) and lax zone (LZ) (P < 0.05) in all test modes compared with the intact motion segment and cage-only group. There were no significant differences between the anchored spacer and cage + locking plate or cage + dynamic plate. Conclusion. The anchored spacer provided a similar biomechanical stability to that of the established anterior fusion technique using an anterior plate plus cage and has a potentially lower perioperative and postoperative morbidity. These results support progression to clinical trials using the cervical anchored spacer as a stand-alone implant.
引用
收藏
页码:156 / 160
页数:5
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]
BOHLER J, 1980, J TRAUMA, V20, P203
[2]
A new stand-alone anterior lumbar interbody fusion device: Biomechanical comparison with established fixation techniques [J].
Cain, CMJ ;
Schleicher, P ;
Gerlach, R ;
Pflugmacher, R ;
Scholz, M ;
Kandziora, F .
SPINE, 2005, 30 (23) :2631-2636
[3]
Coe J. D., 2005, CERVICAL SPINE
[4]
A new technique for determining 3-D joint angles: the tilt/twist method [J].
Crawford, NR ;
Yamaguchi, GT ;
Dickman, CA .
CLINICAL BIOMECHANICS, 1999, 14 (03) :153-165
[5]
AN APPARATUS FOR APPLYING PURE NONCONSTRAINING MOMENTS TO SPINE SEGMENTS IN-VITRO [J].
CRAWFORD, NR ;
BRANTLEY, AGU ;
DICKMAN, CA ;
KOENEMAN, EJ .
SPINE, 1995, 20 (19) :2097-2100
[6]
Construction of local vertebral coordinate systems using a digitizing probe - Technical note [J].
Crawford, NR ;
Dickman, CA .
SPINE, 1997, 22 (05) :559-563
[7]
Crawford NR, 1998, J SPINAL DISORD, V11, P416
[8]
Biomechanical study of a hat type cervical intervertebral fusion cage [J].
Gu, Yu-Tong ;
Jia, Lian-Shun ;
Chen, Tong-Yi .
INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2007, 31 (01) :101-105
[9]
Anterior cervical plating enhances arthrodesis after discectomy and fusion with cortical allograft [J].
Kaiser, MG ;
Haid, RW ;
Subach, BR ;
Barnes, B ;
Rodts, GE .
NEUROSURGERY, 2002, 50 (02) :229-236
[10]
Biomechanical comparison of cervical spine interbody fusion cages [J].
Kandziora, F ;
Pflugmacher, R ;
Schäfer, J ;
Born, C ;
Duda, G ;
Haas, NP ;
Mittlmeier, T .
SPINE, 2001, 26 (17) :1850-1857