Public Perception of Climate Change Voluntary Mitigation and Barriers to Behavior Change

被引:364
作者
Semenza, Jan C. [1 ]
Hall, David E. [4 ]
Wilson, Daniel J. [4 ]
Bontempo, Brian D. [4 ]
Sailor, David J. [2 ]
George, Linda A. [3 ]
机构
[1] Portland State Univ, Sch Community Hlth, Portland, OR 97207 USA
[2] Portland State Univ, Dept Mech & Mat Engn, Portland, OR 97207 USA
[3] Portland State Univ, Environm Sci & Resources Program, Portland, OR 97207 USA
[4] Mt Measurement Inc, Portland, OR USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.amepre.2008.08.020
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Mitigating global climate change requires not only government action but also cooperation from consumers. Population-based, cross-sectional surveys were conducted among 1202 respondents in Portland OR and Houston TX between June and September 2007 regarding awareness, concern, and behavior change related to climate change. The data were subjected to both quantitative and qualitative analyses. Awareness about climate change is virtually universal (98% in Portland and 92% in Houston) with the vast majority reporting some level of concern (90% in Portland and 82% in Houston). A multivariate analysis revealed significant predictors of behavior change: individuals with heightened concern about climate change (p < 0.001); respondents with higher level of education (p = 0.03); younger compared with older individuals (p < 0.001); and Portlanders more likely to change behavior compared with Houstonians (p < 0.001). Of those who changed behavior, 43% reported having reduced their energy usage at home, 39% had reduced gasoline consumption, and 26% engaged in other behaviors, largely recycling. Qualitative data indicate a number of cognitive, behavioral, and structural obstacles to voluntary mitigation. Although consumers are interested in global climate change-mitigation strategies and willing to act accordingly, considerable impediments remain. Government policy must eliminate economic, structural, and social barriers to change and advance accessible and economical alternatives. Individual-level mitigation can be a policy option under favorable contextual conditions, as these results indicate, but must be accompanied by mitigation efforts from industry, commerce, and government.
引用
收藏
页码:479 / 487
页数:9
相关论文
共 44 条
[21]   Climate change and climate variability: Adaptations to reduce adverse health impacts [J].
McMichael, AJ ;
Kovats, RS .
ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT, 2000, 61 (01) :49-64
[22]   Sensitive topics, survey nonresponse, and considerations for interviewer training [J].
O'Brien, Eileen M. ;
Black, Michele C. ;
Carley-Baxter, Lisa R. ;
Simon, Thomas R. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2006, 31 (05) :419-426
[23]   Risk perceptions, general environmental beliefs, and willingness to address climate change [J].
O'Connor, RE ;
Bord, RJ ;
Fisher, A .
RISK ANALYSIS, 1999, 19 (03) :461-471
[24]  
OCKENE J, 1988, CORONARY ACTERY SMOK
[25]   Beyond the ivory tower - The scientific consensus on climate change [J].
Oreskes, N .
SCIENCE, 2004, 306 (5702) :1686-1686
[26]  
PROCHASKA JO, 1983, J CONSULT CLIN PSYCH, V51, P390, DOI 10.1037//0022-006X.51.3.390
[27]   The transtheoretical model of health behavior change [J].
Prochaska, JO ;
Velicer, WF .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH PROMOTION, 1997, 12 (01) :38-48
[28]   IN SEARCH OF HOW PEOPLE CHANGE - APPLICATIONS TO ADDICTIVE BEHAVIORS [J].
PROCHASKA, JO ;
DICLEMENTE, CC ;
NORCROSS, JC .
AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 1992, 47 (09) :1102-1114
[29]   STRONG AND WEAK PRINCIPLES FOR PROGRESSING FROM PRECONTEMPLATION TO ACTION ON THE BASIS OF 12 PROBLEM BEHAVIORS [J].
PROCHASKA, JO .
HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, 1994, 13 (01) :47-51
[30]   American exceptionalism? Similarities and differences in national attitudes toward energy policy and global warming [J].
Reiner, DM ;
Curry, TE ;
De Figueiredo, MA ;
Herzog, HJ ;
Ansolabehere, SD ;
Itaoka, K ;
Johnsson, F ;
Odenberger, M .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2006, 40 (07) :2093-2098