Effect Sizes and Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis in Higher Education

被引:103
作者
Bowman, Nicholas A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Bowling Green State Univ, Dept Higher Educ & Student Affairs, Bowling Green, OH 43403 USA
关键词
Meta-analysis; Higher education; Effect size; Standardized regression coefficients; Hierarchical linear modeling; Quantitative methods; COLLEGE DIVERSITY EXPERIENCES; REGRESSION-ANALYSIS; MULTILEVEL MODELS; ISSUES;
D O I
10.1007/s11162-011-9232-5
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Quantitative meta-analysis is a very useful, yet underutilized, technique for synthesizing research findings in higher education. Meta-analytic inquiry can be more challenging in higher education than in other fields of study as a result of (a) concerns about the use of regression coefficients as a metric for comparing the magnitude of effects across studies, and (b) the non-independence of observations that occurs when a single study contains multiple effect sizes. This methodological note discusses these two important issues and provides concrete suggestions for addressing them. First, meta-analysis scholars have concluded that standardized regression coefficients, which are often provided in higher education manuscripts, constitute an appropriate metric of effect size. Second, hierarchical linear modeling (HLM) analyses provide an effective method for conducting meta-analytic research while accounting for the non-independence of observations, and HLM is generally superior to other proposed methods that attempt to remedy this same problem. A discussion of how to implement these techniques appropriately is provided.
引用
收藏
页码:375 / 382
页数:8
相关论文
共 36 条
[21]  
Hox J.J., 2003, MULT APPL BK SER, P90
[22]  
Kline R. B., 2005, PRINCIPLES PRACTICE, V2nd, DOI DOI 10.15353/CGJSC.V1I1.3787
[23]  
Kreft I., 2004, INTRO MULTILEVEL MOD
[24]   The validity of self-reported grade point averages, class ranks, and test scores:: A meta-analysis and review of the literature [J].
Kuncel, NR ;
Credé, M ;
Thomas, LL .
REVIEW OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH, 2005, 75 (01) :63-82
[25]  
Lipsey M. W., 2001, Practical meta-analysis
[26]   Robustness issues in multilevel regression analysis [J].
Maas, CJM ;
Hox, JJ .
STATISTICA NEERLANDICA, 2004, 58 (02) :127-137
[27]   Gender Effects in the Peer Reviews of Grant Proposals: A Comprehensive Meta-Analysis Comparing Traditional and Multilevel Approaches [J].
Marsh, Herbert W. ;
Bornmann, Lutz ;
Mutz, Ruediger ;
Daniel, Hans-Dieter ;
O'Mara, Alison .
REVIEW OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH, 2009, 79 (03) :1290-1326
[28]  
Matt G.E., 1994, HDB RES SYNTHESIS, P503
[29]   Do self-concept interventions make a difference? A synergistic blend of construct validation and meta-analysis [J].
O'Mara, Alison J. ;
Marsh, Herbert W. ;
Craven, Rhonda G. ;
Debus, Raymond L. .
EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGIST, 2006, 41 (03) :181-206
[30]   On the use of beta coefficients in meta-analysis [J].
Peterson, RA ;
Brown, SP .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2005, 90 (01) :175-181