A meta-analysis of voucher-based reinforcement therapy for substance use disorders

被引:630
作者
Lussier, JP
Heil, SH
Mongeon, JA
Badger, GJ
Higgins, ST
机构
[1] Univ Vermont, Dept Psychol, Burlington, VT 05401 USA
[2] Univ Vermont, Dept Psychiat, Burlington, VT 05401 USA
[3] Univ Vermont, Dept Med Biostat, Burlington, VT 05401 USA
关键词
contingency management; incentives; substance abuse treatment; vouchers;
D O I
10.1111/j.1360-0443.2006.01311.x
中图分类号
R194 [卫生标准、卫生检查、医药管理];
学科分类号
摘要
Aims To systematically investigate the effectiveness of voucher-based reinforcement therapy for the treatment of substance use disorders. Methods Effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals were calculated for studies published between January 1991 and March 2004 that utilized voucher-based reinforcement therapy (VBRT) or related monetary-based incentives to treat substance use disorders (SUDs). Findings Thirty studies involved interventions targeting abstinence from drug use using experimental designs where effects on treatment outcome could be attributed to the VBRT intervention. The estimated average effect size (r) for those studies was 0.32 (95% CI 0.26-0.38). Analyses of variables thought to moderate VBRT effect sizes revealed that more immediate voucher delivery and greater monetary value of the voucher were associated with larger effect sizes. Additional studies were identified wherein VBRT was used to target clinic attendance (n = 6) or medication compliance (n = 4). VBRT studies targeting attendance produced average effect sizes of 0.15 (95% CI 0.02-0.28), while those that targeted medication compliance produced an average effect of 0.32 (95% CI 0.15-0.47). No significant moderators were identified for these 10 studies. Conclusions Overall, VBRT generated significantly better outcomes than did control treatments. These results further support the efficacy of VBRT, quantify the magnitude of its effects, identify significant moderators and suggest potential directions for future research.
引用
收藏
页码:192 / 203
页数:12
相关论文
共 81 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1994, The handbook ofresearch synthesis
[2]   Effects of adding behavioral treatment to opioid detoxification with buprenorphine [J].
Bickel, WK ;
Amass, L ;
Higgins, ST ;
Badger, GJ ;
Esch, RA .
JOURNAL OF CONSULTING AND CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1997, 65 (05) :803-810
[3]   CONTINGENT REINFORCEMENT OF ABSTINENCE WITH INDIVIDUALS ABUSING COCAINE AND MARIJUANA [J].
BUDNEY, AJ ;
HIGGINS, ST ;
DELANEY, DD ;
KENT, L ;
BICKEL, WK .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED BEHAVIOR ANALYSIS, 1991, 24 (04) :657-665
[4]   Adding voucher-based incentives to coping skills and motivational enhancement improves outcomes during treatment for marijuana dependence [J].
Budney, AJ ;
Higgins, ST ;
Radonovich, KJ ;
Novy, PL .
JOURNAL OF CONSULTING AND CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2000, 68 (06) :1051-1061
[5]  
CARROLL KM, 1995, AM J ADDICTION, V4, P56
[6]   Contingency management to enhance naltrexone treatment of opioid dependence: A randomized clinical trial of reinforcement magnitude [J].
Carroll, KM ;
Sinha, R ;
Nich, C ;
Babuscio, T ;
Rounsaville, BJ .
EXPERIMENTAL AND CLINICAL PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2002, 10 (01) :54-63
[7]   Targeting behavioral therapies to enhance naltrexone treatment of opioid dependence -: Efficacy of contingency management and significant other involvement [J].
Carroll, KM ;
Ball, SA ;
Nich, C ;
O'Connor, PG ;
Eagan, DA ;
Frankforter, TL ;
Triffleman, EG ;
Shi, J ;
Rounsaville, BJ .
ARCHIVES OF GENERAL PSYCHIATRY, 2001, 58 (08) :755-761
[8]  
Catania A.C., 1998, LEARNING, V4th
[9]   IMPROVING TREATMENT OUTCOME IN PREGNANT OPIATE-DEPENDENT WOMEN [J].
CHANG, G ;
CARROLL, KM ;
BEHR, HM ;
KOSTEN, TR .
JOURNAL OF SUBSTANCE ABUSE TREATMENT, 1992, 9 (04) :327-330
[10]   Contingent reinforcement sustains post-detoxification abstinence from multiple drugs: A preliminary study with methadone patients [J].
Chutuape, MA ;
Silverman, K ;
Stitzer, M .
DRUG AND ALCOHOL DEPENDENCE, 1999, 54 (01) :69-81