A meta-analysis of voucher-based reinforcement therapy for substance use disorders

被引:630
作者
Lussier, JP
Heil, SH
Mongeon, JA
Badger, GJ
Higgins, ST
机构
[1] Univ Vermont, Dept Psychol, Burlington, VT 05401 USA
[2] Univ Vermont, Dept Psychiat, Burlington, VT 05401 USA
[3] Univ Vermont, Dept Med Biostat, Burlington, VT 05401 USA
关键词
contingency management; incentives; substance abuse treatment; vouchers;
D O I
10.1111/j.1360-0443.2006.01311.x
中图分类号
R194 [卫生标准、卫生检查、医药管理];
学科分类号
摘要
Aims To systematically investigate the effectiveness of voucher-based reinforcement therapy for the treatment of substance use disorders. Methods Effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals were calculated for studies published between January 1991 and March 2004 that utilized voucher-based reinforcement therapy (VBRT) or related monetary-based incentives to treat substance use disorders (SUDs). Findings Thirty studies involved interventions targeting abstinence from drug use using experimental designs where effects on treatment outcome could be attributed to the VBRT intervention. The estimated average effect size (r) for those studies was 0.32 (95% CI 0.26-0.38). Analyses of variables thought to moderate VBRT effect sizes revealed that more immediate voucher delivery and greater monetary value of the voucher were associated with larger effect sizes. Additional studies were identified wherein VBRT was used to target clinic attendance (n = 6) or medication compliance (n = 4). VBRT studies targeting attendance produced average effect sizes of 0.15 (95% CI 0.02-0.28), while those that targeted medication compliance produced an average effect of 0.32 (95% CI 0.15-0.47). No significant moderators were identified for these 10 studies. Conclusions Overall, VBRT generated significantly better outcomes than did control treatments. These results further support the efficacy of VBRT, quantify the magnitude of its effects, identify significant moderators and suggest potential directions for future research.
引用
收藏
页码:192 / 203
页数:12
相关论文
共 81 条
[31]  
HIGGINS ST, 1993, AM J PSYCHIAT, V150, P763
[32]  
HIGGINS ST, 1991, AM J PSYCHIAT, V148, P1218
[33]  
HIGGINS ST, 1999, MOTIVATING BEHAV CHA, P15
[34]   Reinforcing operants other than abstinence in drug abuse treatment: An effective alternative for reducing drug use [J].
Iguchi, MY ;
Belding, MA ;
Morral, AR ;
Lamb, RJ ;
Husband, SD .
JOURNAL OF CONSULTING AND CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1997, 65 (03) :421-428
[35]   The effectiveness of incentives in enhancing treatment attendance and drug abstinence in methadone-maintained pregnant women [J].
Jones, HE ;
Haug, N ;
Silverman, K ;
Stitzer, M ;
Svikis, D .
DRUG AND ALCOHOL DEPENDENCE, 2001, 61 (03) :297-306
[36]   Improving treatment outcomes for pregnant drug-dependent women using low-magnitude voucher incentives [J].
Jones, HE ;
Haug, NA ;
Stitzer, ML ;
Svikis, DS .
ADDICTIVE BEHAVIORS, 2000, 25 (02) :263-267
[37]   Voucher reinforcement for heroin and cocaine abstinence in an outpatient drug-free program [J].
Katz, EC ;
Chutuape, MA ;
Jones, HE ;
Stitzer, ML .
EXPERIMENTAL AND CLINICAL PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2002, 10 (02) :136-143
[38]   The brief abstinence test: Effects of continued incentive availability on cocaine abstinence [J].
Katz, EC ;
Robles-Sotelo, E ;
Correia, CJ ;
Silverman, K ;
Stitzer, ML ;
Bigelow, G .
EXPERIMENTAL AND CLINICAL PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2002, 10 (01) :10-17
[39]   Schedule of voucher delivery influences initiation of cocaine abstinence [J].
Kirby, KC ;
Marlowe, DB ;
Festinger, DS ;
Lamb, RJ ;
Platt, JJ .
JOURNAL OF CONSULTING AND CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1998, 66 (05) :761-767
[40]   Desipramine and contingency management for cocaine and opiate dependence in buprenorphine maintained patients [J].
Kosten, T ;
Oliveto, A ;
Feingold, A ;
Poling, J ;
Sevarino, K ;
McCance-Katz, E ;
Stine, S ;
Gonzalez, G ;
Gonsai, K .
DRUG AND ALCOHOL DEPENDENCE, 2003, 70 (03) :315-325