A NOVEL HYBRID SWARA AND VIKOR METHODOLOGY FOR SUPPLIER SELECTION IN AN AGILE ENVIRONMENT

被引:107
作者
Alimardani, Maryam [1 ]
Hashemkhani Zolfani, Sarfaraz [2 ]
Aghdaie, Mohammad Hasan [3 ]
Tamosaitiene, Jolanta [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tehran, Coll Engn, Dept Ind Engn, Tehran, Iran
[2] Amirkabir Univ Technol, Tehran Polytech, Dept Management Sci & Technol, Futures Studies Res Inst,Technol Foresight Grp, Tehran, Iran
[3] Shomal Univ, Dept Ind Engn, Amol, Mazandaran, Iran
[4] Vilnius Gediminas Tech Univ, Dept Construct Technol & Management, LT-10223 Vilnius, Lithuania
关键词
selection; multiple criteria analysis; method; system; MCDM; DECISION-MAKING MODEL; MULTIPLE CRITERIA; PARTNER SELECTION; AHP; MANAGEMENT; WEIGHTS; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.3846/20294913.2013.814606
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The concept of the agile supply chain has been taken into account as means of achieving a high competitive edge in rapidly changing business environments. Supply partner selection is one of the most appealing issues for agile supply chain management, which have recently been studied by academicians and practitioners. Due to a large number of factors to be considered, supplier selection process is a difficult task for every company. Therefore, supplier selection process can be viewed as a multiple attribute decision-making (MADM) problem. In this paper, a novel hybrid MADM method is proposed for agile supplier selection based on four criteria including performance, cost, flexibility and technology. Two MADM methods, including step-wise weight assessment ratio analysis (SWARA) and Vise Kriterijumska Optimizacija I Kompromisno Resenje (VIKOR) are applied in decision-making process. More precisely, SWARA is used for determining the importance of each criterion and calculating their weights and VIKOR is applied for evaluating alternatives as well as ranking supplier alternatives from the best to the worst. More precisely, the first phase of the proposed methodology step-wise weight assessment ratio analysis (SWARA), is useful for determining the importance of each criterion and calculating the weight of each criterion, and the second phase with Vise Kriterijumska Optimizacija I Kompromisno Resenje (VIKOR) is useful for evaluating alternatives as well as ranking supplier alternatives from the best to the worst. Finally, a real case-study is presented to demonstrate the applicability of the proposed methodology. As a result, the model can help managers to evaluate and select the best supplier regarding own company strategies, resources, policies and etc. for their organization.
引用
收藏
页码:533 / 548
页数:16
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]   Decision Making in Machine Tool Selection: An Integrated Approach with SWARA and COPRAS-G Methods [J].
Aghdaie, Mohammad Hasan ;
Hashemkhani Zolfani, Sarfaraz ;
Zavadskas, Edmundas Kazimieras .
INZINERINE EKONOMIKA-ENGINEERING ECONOMICS, 2013, 24 (01) :5-17
[2]   An integrated fuzzy model for supplier management: A case study of ISP selection and evaluation [J].
Amin, Saman Hassanzadeh ;
Razmi, Jafar .
EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2009, 36 (04) :8639-8648
[3]  
[Anonymous], FAC CIV ENG
[4]  
Antucheviciene J, 2011, INFORMATICA-LITHUAN, V22, P319
[5]   A measure of agility as the complexity of the enterprise system [J].
Arteta, BM ;
Giachetti, RE .
ROBOTICS AND COMPUTER-INTEGRATED MANUFACTURING, 2004, 20 (06) :495-503
[6]   A novel fuzzy multi-criteria decision framework for sustainable supplier selection with incomplete information [J].
Buyukozkan, Gulcin ;
Cifci, Gizem .
COMPUTERS IN INDUSTRY, 2011, 62 (02) :164-174
[7]  
Cagliano R., 2004, Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, V10, P151, DOI 10.1016/j.pursup.2004.11.001
[8]  
Fouladgar MM, 2012, TRANSFORM BUS ECON, V11, P213
[9]   A NEW DETERMINING METHOD FOR THE CRITERIA WEIGHTS IN MULTICRITERIA EVALUATION [J].
Ginevicius, Romualdas .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY & DECISION MAKING, 2011, 10 (06) :1067-1095
[10]   Preference disaggregation for measuring customer satisfaction: The MUSA and analysing method [J].
Grigoroudis, E ;
Siskos, Y .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2002, 143 (01) :148-170