Inertial cavitation dose produced in ex vivo rabbit ear arteries with Optison® by 1-MHz pulsed ultrasound

被引:57
作者
Tu, J [1 ]
Matula, TJ [1 ]
Brayman, AA [1 ]
Crum, LA [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Appl Phys Lab, Ctr Ind & Med Ultrasound, Seattle, WA 98105 USA
关键词
inertial cavitation; passive cavitation detection; broadband noise; ultrasound contrast agents; microbubbles; Optison (R); inertial cavitation dose;
D O I
10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2005.10.001
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
Previous in vitro studies have shown that ultrasound-induced mechanical bioeffects with contrast agents present are highly correlated with inertial cavitation (IC) "dose" (Chen et al. 2003a, 2003c). The ex vivo experiments conducted here addressed the following hypotheses: 1. IC activity can be generated by insonating per-fused rabbit ear blood vessel, and 2. the IC "dose" developed during insonation treatment can be reliably measured and will vary with varying acoustic parameters and Optison(R) concentration. Ex vivo rabbit auricular arteries were perfused with Optison(R) suspensions and then exposed to 1.1-MHz pulsed focused ultrasound. Experimental variables included peak negative acoustic pressure (0.2 MPa to 5.2 MPa), pulse-repetition frequency (5, 50 or 500 Hz), pulse length (50, 100, 500 or 1000 cycles), and Optison(R) volume concentration (0, 0.2, 0.5 or 1%). Cavitation activity was quantified as IC dose, based on passive cavitation detection measurements. The results show that: 1. The IC pressure threshold decreases with higher concentrations of Optison(R), and 2. IC dose increases significantly with increasing acoustic pressure, Optison(R) concentration, pulse length or with decreasing pulse-repetition frequency. (E-mail: juantu@u.washington.edu) (C) 2006 World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology.
引用
收藏
页码:281 / 288
页数:8
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]  
*AIUM, 2000, J ULTRAS MED, V19, P120
[2]   GAUGING THE LIKELIHOOD OF CAVITATION FROM SHORT-PULSE, LOW-DUTY CYCLE DIAGNOSTIC ULTRASOUND [J].
APFEL, RE ;
HOLLAND, CK .
ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1991, 17 (02) :179-185
[3]   Comparison of electrohydraulic lithotripters with rigid and pressure-release ellipsoidal reflectors. II. Cavitation fields [J].
Bailey, MR ;
Blackstock, DT ;
Cleveland, RO ;
Crum, LA .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1999, 106 (02) :1149-1160
[4]   CURRENT STATUS OF RESEARCH ON BIOPHYSICAL EFFECTS OF ULTRASOUND [J].
BARNETT, SB ;
TERHAAR, GR ;
ZISKIN, MC ;
NYBORG, WL ;
MAEDA, K ;
BANG, J .
ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1994, 20 (03) :205-218
[5]   Thresholds for inertial cavitation in Albunex suspensions under pulsed ultrasound conditions [J].
Chang, PP ;
Chen, WS ;
Mourad, PD ;
Poliachik, SL ;
Crum, LA .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ULTRASONICS FERROELECTRICS AND FREQUENCY CONTROL, 2001, 48 (01) :161-170
[6]   Inertial cavitation dose and hemolysis produced in vitro with or without Optison® [J].
Chen, WS ;
Brayman, AA ;
Matula, TJ ;
Crum, LA .
ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2003, 29 (05) :725-737
[7]   The pulse length-dependence of inertial cavitation dose and hemolysis [J].
Chen, WS ;
Brayman, AA ;
Matula, TJ ;
Crum, LA ;
Miller, MW .
ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2003, 29 (05) :739-748
[8]   A comparison of the fragmentation thresholds and inertial cavitation doses of different ultrasound contrast agents [J].
Chen, WS ;
Matula, TJ ;
Brayman, AA ;
Crum, LA .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2003, 113 (01) :643-651
[9]   ACOUSTIC CAVITATION NOISE SPECTRA [J].
CRAMER, E ;
LAUTERBORN, W .
APPLIED SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH, 1982, 38 :209-214