Habitat Quality and Salt-Marsh Species Assemblages along an Anthropogenic Estuarine Landscape

被引:45
作者
Partyka, Melissa L. [2 ]
Peterson, Mark S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ So Mississippi, Dept Coastal Sci, Ocean Springs, MS 39564 USA
[2] Natl Ocean & Atmospher Adm, DOC Marine Operat Ctr, Norfolk, VA 23510 USA
关键词
Pascagoula River estuary; Mississippi;
D O I
10.2112/07-0937.1
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
We evaluated habitat conditions available to infauna and epifauna across a gradient of shoreline development within the Pascagoula River estuary, Missisippi, to determine whether habitat characteristics and biotic responses were influenced by the degree of surrounding alteration. Three zones were defined: (H) severe alteration, (M) intermediate alteration, and (L) natural conditions starting about 5 km upstream. Eleven water-quality and habitat variables were quantified for infaunal and epifaunal nekton as indicators of habitat quality adjacent to both "restricted" and hardened shore and "unrestricted" or marsh-edge shore within each impact zone. Epifaunal nekton richness (S) was consistently greater at unrestricted shore types than restricted ones, highest in zone M and lowest in zone H, whereas infaunal S did not vary among impact zones or between shore types. Cluster analysis showed epifaunal nekton assemblages from unrestricted shores in zones M and L were most similar to each other, whereas restricted shore infaunal assemblages from zones H and M linked at similar to 70%. SIMPER analysis indicated infaunal composition was not dissimilar among zones or between shore types. In contrast, epifaunal nekton assemblages were dissimilar from one another because of the presence and density of Corophium louisianum and Hargeria rapax, two major fish prey items. Our data suggest the relative quality of marsh-edge habitat depends upon the surrounding landscape and that the simple presence of marsh habitat is not enough to ensure a high level of ecosystem health. Rather, it is the spatial arrangement of the marsh that markedly affects the system's health. It is apparent that even the smallest patch of marsh habitat supported a larger diversity of fauna than nearby restricted habitats, suggesting that it matters where a salt-marsh habitat patch (including restoration sites) is located along the landscape because it will influence habitat quality and connectivity and thus the composition of infauna and epifauna nekton assemblages.
引用
收藏
页码:1570 / 1581
页数:12
相关论文
共 57 条
[31]   Salt marshes as nurseries for nekton: testing hypotheses on density, growth and survival through meta-analysis [J].
Minello, TJ ;
Able, KW ;
Weinstein, MP ;
Hays, CG .
MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES, 2003, 246 :39-59
[32]   THE IMPORTANCE OF EDGE FOR NATANT MACROFAUNA IN A CREATED SALT-MARSH [J].
MINELLO, TJ ;
ZIMMERMAN, RJ ;
MEDINA, R .
WETLANDS, 1994, 14 (03) :184-198
[33]   A monitoring protocol to assess tidal restoration of salt marshes on local and regional scales [J].
Neckles, HA ;
Dionne, M ;
Burdick, DM ;
Roman, CT ;
Buchsbaum, R ;
Hutchins, E .
RESTORATION ECOLOGY, 2002, 10 (03) :556-563
[34]   Plant species diversity and composition: experimental effects on marine epifaunal assemblages [J].
Parker, JD ;
Duffy, JE ;
Orth, RJ .
MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES, 2001, 224 :55-67
[35]   Habitat use by early life-history stages of fishes and crustaceans along a changing estuarine landscape: Differences between natural and altered shoreline sites [J].
Peterson M.S. ;
Comyns B.H. ;
Hendon J.R. ;
Bond P.J. ;
Duff G.A. .
Wetlands Ecology and Management, 2000, 8 (2-3) :209-219
[36]   A conceptual view of environment-habitat-production linkages in tidal river estuaries [J].
Peterson, MS .
REVIEWS IN FISHERIES SCIENCE, 2003, 11 (04) :291-313
[37]   Distribution, habitat characterization, and aspects of reproduction of a peripheral population of bluespotted sunfish Enneacanthus gloriosus (Holbrook) [J].
Peterson, MS ;
VanderKooy, SJ .
JOURNAL OF FRESHWATER ECOLOGY, 1997, 12 (01) :151-161
[38]   Top-down versus bottom-up limitation in benthic infaunal communities: Direct and indirect effects [J].
Posey, MH ;
Alphin, TD ;
Cahoon, LB ;
Lindquist, DG ;
Mallin, MA ;
Nevers, MB .
ESTUARIES, 2002, 25 (05) :999-1014
[39]  
Rakocinski C. F., 2000, Journal of Aquatic Ecosystem Stress and Recovery, V7, P201, DOI 10.1023/A:1009931721009
[40]   Early responses of fishes and crustaceans to restoration of a tidally restricted New England salt marsh [J].
Raposa, K .
RESTORATION ECOLOGY, 2002, 10 (04) :665-676