Detection of biofilm formation in Staphylococcus epidermidis from implant infections.: Comparison of a PCR-method that recognizes the presence of ica genes with two classic phenotypic methods

被引:93
作者
Arciola, CR [1 ]
Campoccia, D
Baldassarri, L
Donati, ME
Pirini, V
Gamberini, S
Montanaro, L
机构
[1] Rizzoli Orthoped Inst, Res Unit Implant Infect, Bologna, Italy
[2] Univ Bologna, Dept Expt Pathol, I-40126 Bologna, Italy
[3] Ist Super Sanita, Dept Infect Parasit & Immuno Mediated Dis, I-00161 Rome, Italy
关键词
biomaterial-associated infections; Staphylococcus epidermidis; biofilm detection; ica genes; Congo red agar;
D O I
10.1002/jbm.a.30552
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Biofilm-forming ability is increasingly being recognized as an important virulence factor in Staphylococcus epidermidis. This study compares three different techniques for the detection of biofilm-positive strains. The presence of icaA and icaD genes responsible for biofilm synthesis was investigated by a PCR method in a collection of 80 S. epidermidis strains isolated from orthopedic implant infections. The results from molecular analysis were compared with those obtained by two classic phenotypic methods, the Congo red agar (CRA) plate test and the microtiter plate test (MtP). Fifty-seven percent of all the examined strains were found icaA/icaD-positive, of which only three were not positive for CRA test. Differently, by the MtP method, 66% of the strains were found to be biofilm-producers but only a limited agreement with the PCR-method was noticeable be-cause of the observation of (icaA/icaD+)MtP- strains (8%) and of a surprising ambiguous result of (icaA/icaD-)MtP+ strains (16%). The category of the weak biofilm-producers provided the highest contribution to these mismatching results (10%). The better agreement between the CRA plate test with the molecular detection of ica genes indicates the former as a reliable test for the phenotypic characterization of virulence of clinical isolates. However, MtP method remains a precious tool for the in vitro screening of different biornaterials for the adhesive properties using a reference strain. (c) 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:425 / 430
页数:6
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
An YH, 1998, J BIOMED MATER RES, V43, P338, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(199823)43:3<338::AID-JBM16>3.0.CO
[2]  
2-B
[3]  
Arciola Carla Renata, 2002, Expert Rev Mol Diagn, V2, P478, DOI 10.1586/14737159.2.5.478
[4]   Detection of slime production by means of an optimised Congo red agar plate test based on a colourimetric scale in Staphylococcus epidermidis clinical isolates genotyped for ica locus [J].
Arciola, CR ;
Campoccia, D ;
Gamberini, S ;
Cervellati, M ;
Donati, E ;
Montanaro, L .
BIOMATERIALS, 2002, 23 (21) :4233-4239
[5]   In catheter infections by Staphylococcus epidermidis the intercellular adhesion (ica) locus is a molecular marker of the virulent slime-producing strains [J].
Arciola, CR ;
Baldassarri, L ;
Montanaro, L .
JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL MATERIALS RESEARCH, 2002, 59 (03) :557-562
[6]   Presence of icaA and icaD genes and slime production in a collection of staphylococcal strains from catheter-associated infections [J].
Arciola, CR ;
Baldassarri, L ;
Montanaro, L .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2001, 39 (06) :2151-2156
[7]   A rapid PCR method for the detection of slime-producing strains of Staphylococcus epidermidis and S-aureus in periprosthesis infections [J].
Arciola, CR ;
Collamati, S ;
Donati, E ;
Montanaro, L .
DIAGNOSTIC MOLECULAR PATHOLOGY, 2001, 10 (02) :130-137
[8]  
ARCIOLA CR, IN PRESS J BIOMED MA
[9]   Expression of slime interferes with in vitro detection of host protein receptors of Staphylococcus epidermidis [J].
Baldassarri, L ;
Donelli, G ;
Gelosia, A ;
Simpson, AW ;
Christensen, GD .
INFECTION AND IMMUNITY, 1997, 65 (04) :1522-1526
[10]   ADHERENCE OF COAGULASE-NEGATIVE STAPHYLOCOCCI TO PLASTIC TISSUE-CULTURE PLATES - A QUANTITATIVE MODEL FOR THE ADHERENCE OF STAPHYLOCOCCI TO MEDICAL DEVICES [J].
CHRISTENSEN, GD ;
SIMPSON, WA ;
YOUNGER, JJ ;
BADDOUR, LM ;
BARRETT, FF ;
MELTON, DM ;
BEACHEY, EH .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1985, 22 (06) :996-1006