The use of shock wave lithotripsy for renal calculi

被引:20
作者
Putman, SS [1 ]
Hamilton, BD [1 ]
Johnson, DB [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Utah, Ctr Hlth Sci, Div Urol, Salt Lake City, UT 84132 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1097/00042307-200403000-00012
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose of review Shock wave lithotripsy has been considered a mainstay of therapy for renal calculi for the last 20 years. Shock wave lithotripsy is noninvasive and requires the least anesthesia of the treatment modalities for treatment of renal calculi and therein lies its popularity. In the last decade, however, there have been changes in thinking regarding methods of patient selection for shock wave lithotripsy, changes in the technique of the existing shock wave lithotriptors; and new technologies designed to increase the efficacy of shock wave lithotriptors. Recent findings New studies have shown that shock wave lithotripsy may be less effective than other modalities for treating lower pole stones. Other existing technologies, such as computerized tomography, are being used to more effectively select patients for shock wave lithotripsy. Ongoing studies are evaluating changing the shock wave rate to increase stone fragmentation. In addition, efforts are being made to improve lithotripsy by designing more effective lithotriptors. Summary Shock wave lithotripsy has become a widely used modality for treating renal calculi due to its noninvasive nature and ease of application. Although success rates are reasonable, there is room for improvement. With appropriate patient selection, significant improvements in stone-free rates may be achieved. It is anticipated that, with further research, improvements in lithotriptor design will result in higher treatment success rates with reduced renal trauma and improved patient comfort.
引用
收藏
页码:117 / 121
页数:5
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]   Lower pole I: A prospective randomized trial of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and percutaneous nephrostolithotomy for lower pole nephrolithiasis - Initial results [J].
Albala, DM ;
Assimos, DG ;
Clayman, RV ;
Denstedt, JD ;
Grasso, M ;
Gutierrez-Aceves, J ;
Kahn, RI ;
Leveillee, RJ ;
Lingeman, JE ;
Macaluso, JN ;
Munch, LC ;
Nakada, SY ;
Newman, RC ;
Pearle, MS ;
Preminger, GM ;
Teichman, J ;
Woods, JR .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2001, 166 (06) :2072-2080
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1989, J UROLOGY, V141, P705
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1990, J ENDOUROL, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-1-59259-972-1_28
[4]   Stone clearance in lower pole nephrolithiasis after extra corporeal shock wave lithotripsy – the controversy continues [J].
M Hammad Ather ;
Fuad Abid ;
Sobia Akhtar ;
Karim Khawaja .
BMC Urology, 3 (1)
[5]   COMPARISON OF FIRST GENERATION (DORNIER-HM3) AND 2ND GENERATION (MEDSTONE-STS) LITHOTRIPTORS - TREATMENT RESULTS WITH 13,864 RENAL AND URETERAL CALCULI [J].
CASS, AS .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1995, 153 (03) :588-592
[6]  
CHAUSSY C, 1983, UROL CLIN N AM, V10, P743
[7]   A 2-YEAR EXPERIENCE WITH THE WOLF PIEZOELECTRIC LITHOTRIPTOR - IMPACT OF REPEAT TREATMENT ON RESULTS AND COMPLICATIONS [J].
COPE, RM ;
MIDDLETON, RG ;
SMITH, JA .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1991, 145 (06) :1141-1145
[8]   Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy of 2000 urinary calculi with the Modulith SL-20: Success and failure according to size and location of stones [J].
Coz, F ;
Orvieto, M ;
Bustos, M ;
Lyng, R ;
Stein, C ;
Hinrichs, A ;
San Francisco, I .
JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2000, 14 (03) :239-246
[9]   Lower-pole caliceal stone clearance after shockwave lithotripsy, percutaneous nephrolithotomy, and flexible ureteroscopy: Impact of radiographic spatial anatomy [J].
Elbahnasy, AM ;
Clayman, RV ;
Shalhav, AL ;
Hoenig, DM ;
Chandhoke, P ;
Lingeman, JE ;
Denstedt, JD ;
Kahn, R ;
Assimos, DG ;
Nakada, SY .
JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 1998, 12 (02) :113-119
[10]   Effectiveness and safety of the Dornier compact lithotriptor: An evaluative multicenter study [J].
Elhilali, MM ;
Stoller, ML ;
McNamara, TC ;
Morehouse, DD ;
Wolf, JS ;
Keeler, LL .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1996, 155 (03) :834-838