Reviewing intuitive decision-making and uncertainty: the implications for medical education

被引:171
作者
Hall, KH [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Otago, Sch Med, Dept Gen Practice, Dunedin, New Zealand
关键词
education; medical/standards; decision making; professional practice; uncertaintly; prejudice; curriculum;
D O I
10.1046/j.1365-2923.2002.01140.x
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Context Intuition and uncertainty are inescapable conditions of many instances of clinical decision-making. Under such conditions biases and heuristics may operate, distorting the decision-making process. Physicians and students are generally unaware of these influences. Purpose To review the extant literature regarding the role of uncertainty and intuition and associated biases on medical decision-making, to highlight the implications this holds for medical education. Content Using literature identified via Medline and Bioethicsline searches of the past 3 decades, this paper reviews the sources of uncertainty in clinical practice and the role of intuitive decision-making. A detailed description of associated heuristics and biases is provided, and linked with demonstrable examples from medical decision-making. Conclusions It is argued that although uncertainty can be reduced, it can never be completely eliminated from decision-making. Therefore most decision-making performed in medicine contains an irreducible intuitive element and is thus vulnerable to these biases and heuristics. Given that few medical curricula overtly address the process of medical decision-making, both medical students and physicians remain vulnerable to these effects on their own (and their patients') decision-making. Insight via education appears the major means in which to avoid distorting decision-making processes.
引用
收藏
页码:216 / 224
页数:9
相关论文
共 68 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1988, CLIN CHEM
[2]  
ARKES H, 1988, PROFESSIONAL JUDGEME, P163
[3]  
ARKES HR, 1988, PROFESSIONAL JUDGMEN, P374
[4]   Risky business: Challenges in vaccine risk communication [J].
Ball, LK ;
Evans, G ;
Bostrom, A .
PEDIATRICS, 1998, 101 (03) :453-458
[5]  
BEAUCHAMP TL, 1994, PRINCIPLES BIOMEDICA, P142
[6]   UNCERTAINTY AND THE SHAPING OF MEDICAL DECISIONS [J].
BERESFORD, EB .
HASTINGS CENTER REPORT, 1991, 21 (04) :6-11
[7]   Clinical diagnosis and the order information [J].
Bergus, GR ;
Chapman, GB ;
Levy, BT ;
Ely, JW ;
Oppliger, RA .
MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 1998, 18 (04) :412-417
[8]   THE SORCERERS BROOM - MEDICINES RAMPANT TECHNOLOGY [J].
CASSELL, EJ .
HASTINGS CENTER REPORT, 1993, 23 (06) :32-39
[9]   Visions of rationality [J].
Chase, VM ;
Hertwig, R ;
Gigerenzer, G .
TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 1998, 2 (06) :206-214
[10]   BIASES IN HOW PHYSICIANS CHOOSE TO WITHDRAW LIFE-SUPPORT [J].
CHRISTAKIS, NA ;
ASCH, DA .
LANCET, 1993, 342 (8872) :642-646