FOLFOX4 plus cetuximab administered weekly or every second week in the first-line treatment of patients with KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer: a randomized phase II CECOG study

被引:57
作者
Brodowicz, T. [1 ,2 ]
Ciuleanu, T. E. [3 ]
Radosavljevic, D. [4 ]
Shacham-Shmueli, E. [5 ]
Vrbanec, D. [6 ]
Plate, S. [7 ]
Mrsic-Krmpotic, Z. [8 ]
Dank, M. [9 ]
Purkalne, G. [10 ]
Messinger, D. [11 ]
Zielinski, C. C. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Med Univ Vienna, Dept Med 1, A-1090 Vienna, Austria
[2] Ctr Comprehens Canc, Vienna, Austria
[3] Inst Oncol, Cluj Napoca, Romania
[4] Inst Oncol & Radiol, Belgrade, Serbia
[5] Tel Aviv Sourasky Med Ctr, Div Oncol, Tel Aviv, Israel
[6] Univ Hosp Zagreb Rebro, Dept Oncol, Zagreb, Croatia
[7] Latvian Ctr Oncol, Riga, Latvia
[8] Univ Hosp Tumors, Dept Med Oncol, Zagreb, Croatia
[9] Semmelweis Univ, Radiol Clin, H-1085 Budapest, Hungary
[10] Stradins Univ Hosp, Riga, Latvia
[11] IST GmbH, Biometr, Mannheim, Germany
关键词
cetuximab every second week; FOLFOX4; KRAS wild-type; metastatic colorectal cancer; GROWTH-FACTOR RECEPTOR; BIWEEKLY CETUXIMAB; CELL CARCINOMA; ANTIBODY C225; IRINOTECAN; CHEMOTHERAPY; OXALIPLATIN; PROLIFERATION; FLUOROURACIL; MULTICENTER;
D O I
10.1093/annonc/mdt116
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: This randomized phase If study investigated first-line chemotherapy plus cetuximab administered every second week in KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer. Patients and methods: Patients received FOLFOX4 plus either standard weekly cetuximab (arm 1) or cetuximab (500 mg/m(2)) every second week (arm 2), until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Primary end point was the objective response rate (ORR). Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), disease control rate (OCR) and safety were also investigated. The study was not powered to establish non-inferiority, but aimed at the estimation of treatment differences. Results: Of 152 randomized eligible patients, 75 were treated in arm 1 and 77 in arm 2; ORRs [53% versus 62%, odds ratio 1.40, 95% confidence interval (Cl) 0.74-2.66], PFS [median 9.5 versus 9.2 months, hazard ratio (HR) 0.92, 95% Cl 0.63-1.34], OS (median 25.8 versus 23.0 months, HR 0.86, 95% Cl 0.56-1.30) and OCR (87%) were comparable. HRs adjusted for baseline factors were 1.01 and 0.99 for PFS and OS, respectively. Frequencies of grade 3/4 adverse events in arms 1 versus 2 were similar: most common were neutropenia (28% versus 34%) and rash (15% versus 17%). Conclusions: Activity and safety of FOLFOX4 plus either cetuximab administered weekly or every second week were similar.
引用
收藏
页码:1769 / 1777
页数:9
相关论文
共 39 条
[21]  
Klein J.P., 1997, SURVIVAL ANAL
[22]   Multicenter phase II and translational study of cetuximab in metastatic colorectal carcinoma refractory to irinotecan, oxaliplatin, and fluoropyrimidines [J].
Lenz, Heinz-Josef ;
Van Cutsem, Eric ;
Khambata-Ford, Shirin ;
Mayer, Robert J. ;
Gold, Philip ;
Stella, Philip ;
Mirtsching, Barry ;
Cohn, Allen L. ;
Pippas, Andrew W. ;
Azarnia, Nozar ;
Tsuchihashi, Zenta ;
Mauro, David J. ;
Rowinsky, Eric K. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2006, 24 (30) :4914-4921
[23]   Structural basis for inhibition of the epidermal growth factor receptor by cetuximab [J].
Li, SQ ;
Schmitz, KR ;
Jeffrey, PD ;
Wiltzius, JJW ;
Kussie, P ;
Ferguson, KM .
CANCER CELL, 2005, 7 (04) :301-311
[24]   KRAS mutations as an independent prognostic factor in patients with advanced colorectal cancer treated with cetuximab [J].
Lievre, Astrid ;
Bachet, Jean-Baptiste ;
Boige, Valerie ;
Cayre, Anne ;
Le Corre, Delphine ;
Buc, Emmanuel ;
Ychou, Marc ;
Bouche, Olivier ;
Landi, Bruno ;
Louvet, Christophe ;
Andre, Thierry ;
Bibeau, Frederic ;
Diebold, Marie-Daniele ;
Rougier, Philippe ;
Ducreux, Michel ;
Tomasic, Gorana ;
Emile, Jean-Francois ;
Penault-Llorca, Frederique ;
Laurent-Puig, Pierre .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2008, 26 (03) :374-379
[25]   Biweekly cetuximab and irinotecan in advanced colorectal cancer patients progressing after at least one previous line of chemotherapy:: results of a phase II single institution trial [J].
Martin-Martorell, P. ;
Rosello, S. ;
Rodriguez-Braun, E. ;
Chirivella, I. ;
Bosch, A. ;
Cervantes, A. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2008, 99 (03) :455-458
[26]  
Nolting A., 2006, PHARMACOKINETICS PHA, P353
[27]   Cetuximab plus FOLFOX6 or FOLFIRI in metastatic colorectal cancer: CECOG trial [J].
Ocvirk, Janja ;
Brodowicz, Thomas ;
Wrba, Fritz ;
Ciuleanu, Tudor E. ;
Kurteva, Galina ;
Beslija, Semir ;
Koza, Ivan ;
Zsuzsanna Papai ;
Messinger, Diethelm ;
Yilmaz, Ugur ;
Zsolt Faluhelyi ;
Yalcin, Suayib ;
Papamichael, Demetris ;
Miklos Wenczl ;
Mrsic-Krmpotic, Zrinka ;
Shacham-Shmueli, Einat ;
Vrbanec, Damir ;
Esser, Regina ;
Scheithauer, Werner ;
Zielinski, Christoph C. .
WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2010, 16 (25) :3133-3143
[28]  
Perrotte P, 1999, CLIN CANCER RES, V5, P257
[29]   Biweekly cetuximab and irinotecan as third-line therapy in patients with advanced colorectal cancer after failure to irinotecan, oxaliplatin and 5-fluorouracil [J].
Pfeiffer, P. ;
Nielsen, D. ;
Bjerregaard, J. ;
Qvortrup, C. ;
Yilmaz, M. ;
Jensen, B. .
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2008, 19 (06) :1141-1145
[30]   KRAS and BRAF Mutations in Advanced Colorectal Cancer Are Associated With Poor Prognosis but Do Not Preclude Benefit From Oxaliplatin or Irinotecan: Results From the MRC FOCUS Trial [J].
Richman, Susan D. ;
Seymour, Matthew T. ;
Chambers, Philip ;
Elliott, Faye ;
Daly, Catherine L. ;
Meade, Angela M. ;
Taylor, Graham ;
Barrett, Jennifer H. ;
Quirke, Philip .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2009, 27 (35) :5931-5937