A comparison of response rate, response time, and costs of mail and electronic surveys

被引:80
作者
Shannon, DM [1 ]
Bradshaw, CC [1 ]
机构
[1] Auburn Univ, Haley Ctr EFLT 4036, Auburn, AL 36849 USA
关键词
electronic surveys; Internet; response rates; response times; survey research;
D O I
10.1080/00220970209599505
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Response rates, response time, and costs of mail and electronic surveys were compared. The survey sample consisted of college faculty in the southeastern United States. Mail surveys yielded a higher response rate and a lower rate of undeliverable surveys. However, receipt of responses was significantly quicker for those delivered electronically, with over 80% of initial responses arriving before receipt of the 1st returned mail survey. The costs associated with distribution of surveys and preparation of data for analysis were much lower with the electronically delivered surveys.
引用
收藏
页码:179 / 192
页数:14
相关论文
共 29 条
[11]   Multiplicative difference sets via additive characters [J].
Dillon, JF .
DESIGNS CODES AND CRYPTOGRAPHY, 1999, 17 (1-3) :225-235
[12]  
EATON B, 1997, MARKETING RES RE JUN
[13]  
HERBERLEIN TA, 1978, AM SOCIOL REV, V43, P447
[14]   RESPONSE EFFECTS IN THE ELECTRONIC SURVEY [J].
KIESLER, S ;
SPROULL, LS .
PUBLIC OPINION QUARTERLY, 1986, 50 (03) :402-413
[15]   COMPUTER TECHNOLOGIES - ATTITUDES AND SELF-EFFICACY ACROSS UNDERGRADUATE DISCIPLINES [J].
KINZIE, MB ;
DELCOURT, MAB ;
POWERS, SM .
RESEARCH IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 1994, 35 (06) :745-768
[16]   STIMULATING RESPONSES TO MAILED QUESTIONNAIRES - REVIEW [J].
LINSKY, AS .
PUBLIC OPINION QUARTERLY, 1975, 39 (01) :82-101
[17]   Postal surveys versus electronic mail surveys - The tortoise and the hare revisited [J].
Mavis, BE ;
Brocato, JJ .
EVALUATION & THE HEALTH PROFESSIONS, 1998, 21 (03) :395-408
[18]  
MEHTA R, 1995, J MARKET RES SOC, V37, P429
[19]  
PARKER L, 1992, TRAINING DEV, V46, P52
[20]   Development of a standard E-mail methodology - Results of an experiment [J].
Schaefer, DR ;
Dillman, DA .
PUBLIC OPINION QUARTERLY, 1998, 62 (03) :378-397