Mechanism design with a liquidity constrained buyer: The 2 x 2 case

被引:6
作者
Che, YK
Gale, I [1 ]
机构
[1] Georgetown Univ, Dept Econ, Washington, DC 20057 USA
[2] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Econ, Madison, WI 53706 USA
[3] CSIC, Inst Analisi Econ, Barcelona, Spain
关键词
mechanism design; liquidity constraint;
D O I
10.1016/S0014-2921(98)00107-X
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper studies the implications of buyers' liquidity constraints for the optimal selling strategy. The possibility that a buyer faces a binding liquidity constraint affects the seller's strategy in a nontrivial way. Specifically, when a seller has one unit of a good to sell to a buyer with a quasilinear utility function, the 'no-haggling' result indicates that textbook monopoly pricing is optimal, absent liquidity constraints. Introducing a potentially binding liquidity constraint vitiates the no-haggling result, and can make it strictly beneficial for the seller to use nonlinear pricing, to commit to a declining price sequence, or to require the buyer to post a cash bond. (C) 1999 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:947 / 957
页数:11
相关论文
共 8 条
[1]   Multiproduct nonlinear pricing [J].
Armstrong, M .
ECONOMETRICA, 1996, 64 (01) :51-75
[2]  
CHE YK, 1997, OPTIMAL MECH SELLING
[3]   FOUNDATIONS OF DYNAMIC MONOPOLY AND THE COASE CONJECTURE [J].
GUL, F ;
SONNENSCHEIN, H ;
WILSON, R .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC THEORY, 1986, 39 (01) :155-190
[4]  
HARRIS M, 1981, AM ECON REV, V71, P347
[5]  
JEHIEL P, 1998, MULTIDIMENSIONAL MEC
[6]   OPTIMAL SELLING STRATEGIES - WHEN TO HAGGLE, WHEN TO HOLD FIRM [J].
RILEY, J ;
ZECKHAUSER, R .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1983, 98 (02) :267-289
[7]   Ironing, sweeping, and multidimensional screening [J].
Rochet, JC ;
Chone, P .
ECONOMETRICA, 1998, 66 (04) :783-826
[8]   INTERTEMPORAL PRICE-DISCRIMINATION [J].
STOKEY, NL .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1979, 93 (03) :355-371