What makes for a good break? A diary study on recovery experiences during lunch break

被引:73
作者
Bosch, Christine [1 ]
Sonnentag, Sabine [1 ]
Pinck, Anna Sophia [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Mannheim, Dept Psychol, D-68131 Mannheim, Germany
关键词
diary study; lunch break; recovery experiences; self-efficacy; well-being; WORK ENGAGEMENT; SELF-EFFICACY; INITIAL VALIDATION; DAY-LEVEL; PERFORMANCE; RESOURCES; AUTONOMY; BURNOUT; NEED; QUESTIONNAIRE;
D O I
10.1111/joop.12195
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
This study investigated the role of four recovery experiences during lunch break for employees' afternoon well-being. We hypothesized that lunch-break recovery experiences (psychological detachment, relaxation, control, and relatedness) reduce afternoon exhaustion and enhance afternoon work engagement via replenished personal resources (i.e., state of being recovered immediately after break and subsequent self-efficacy regarding the upcoming tasks in the afternoon). One hundred and nine employees provided daily survey data three times a day (i.e., start of work, after lunch break, end of work) over a period of two workweeks. Multilevel path analysis showed that relaxation, control, and relatedness during lunch break negatively predicted afternoon exhaustion and positively predicted afternoon work engagement via state of being recovered. For relaxation and relatedness, we additionally found positive serial indirect effects on afternoon work engagement via state of being recovered and self-efficacy. Psychological detachment was not related to personal resources and afternoon well-being. This study demonstrates that experiencing control over lunch break and using the lunch break to relax and to relate to others are indirectly associated with improved afternoon well-being via replenished personal resources.
引用
收藏
页码:134 / 157
页数:24
相关论文
共 69 条
[41]   Effects of breaks on regaining vitality at work: An empirical comparison of 'conventional' and 'smart phone' breaks [J].
Rhee, Hongjai ;
Kim, Sudong .
COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2016, 57 :160-167
[42]   Effects of occupational stress management intervention programs: A meta-analysis [J].
Richardson, Katherine M. ;
Rothstein, Hannah R. .
JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, 2008, 13 (01) :69-93
[43]   Job demands, job resources, and their relationship with burnout and engagement: a multi-sample study [J].
Schaufeli, WB ;
Bakker, AB .
JOURNAL OF ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR, 2004, 25 (03) :293-315
[44]   The measurement of work engagement with a short questionnaire - A cross-national study [J].
Schaufeli, Wilmar B. ;
Bakker, Arnold B. ;
Salanova, Marisa .
EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 2006, 66 (04) :701-716
[45]  
Shirom A., 2006, INT J STRESS MANAGE, V13, P176, DOI [10.1037/1072-5245.13.2.176, DOI 10.1037/1072-5245.13.2.176]
[46]   Associations between job burnout and self-efficacy: a meta-analysis [J].
Shoji, Kotaro ;
Cieslak, Roman ;
Smoktunowicz, Ewelina ;
Rogala, Anna ;
Benight, Charles C. ;
Luszczynska, Aleksandra .
ANXIETY STRESS AND COPING, 2016, 29 (04) :367-386
[47]  
Sianoja M., 2017, J OCCUPATIONAL HLTH
[48]  
Sianoja M., 2016, Scandinavian Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, V1, P7, DOI [DOI 10.16993/SJWOP.13, 10.16993/sjwop.1, 10.16993/sjwop.13]
[49]  
Sianoja M., 2015, JOB STRESS RISK FACT, P1
[50]   Recovery, work engagement, and proactive behavior: A new look at the interface between nonwork and work [J].
Sonnentag, S .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2003, 88 (03) :518-528