Stuck in the past: Why managers persist with new product failures

被引:110
作者
Biyalogorsky, E [1 ]
Boulding, W
Staelin, R
机构
[1] Univ Calif Davis, Grad Sch Management, Davis, CA 95616 USA
[2] Duke Univ, Fuqua Sch Business, Durham, NC 27706 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1509/jmkg.70.2.108
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
In this research, the authors examine the phenomenon of escalation bias in the context of managing new product introductions. In particular, they identify three general paths-Decision Involvement Inertia, Decision Involvement Distortion, and Belief Inertia Distortion-that can lead managers to escalate their commitments. The authors test the relative strength of these paths in driving observed escalation behavior. The results show that involvement with the initial decision, a key construct in numerous explanations for escalation behavior (e.g., agency theory, self-justification), is not a necessary condition to induce commitment to a losing course of action (i.e., escalation bias). Rather, the authors find that the driving force behind escalation behavior is improper use of initial positive beliefs in the face of negative new information. This insight has implications for the groundwork necessary for organizations to design systems, policies, and procedures to help them avoid the trap of escalation bias that is often associated with major strategic decisions.
引用
收藏
页码:108 / 121
页数:14
相关论文
共 60 条
[1]  
AJZEN I, 1977, PSYCHOL BULL, V84, P233
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1993, 100 Statistical Tests
[3]   THE PSYCHOLOGY OF SUNK COST [J].
ARKES, HR ;
BLUMER, C .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1985, 35 (01) :124-140
[4]   STRATEGIC AND TACTICAL LOGICS OF DECISION JUSTIFICATION - POWER AND DECISION CRITERIA IN ORGANIZATIONS [J].
BACHARACH, SB ;
BAMBERGER, P ;
MUNDELL, B .
HUMAN RELATIONS, 1995, 48 (05) :467-488
[5]   AN EMPIRICAL-TEST OF STAW AND ROSS PRESCRIPTIONS FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF ESCALATION OF COMMITMENT BEHAVIOR IN ORGANIZATIONS [J].
BARTON, SL ;
DUCHON, D ;
DUNEGAN, KJ .
DECISION SCIENCES, 1989, 20 (03) :532-544
[6]  
BAZERMAN M, 1984, EUROPEAN MANAGEMENT, V10, P163
[7]   THE RELEVANCE OF KAHNEMAN AND TVERSKY CONCEPT OF FRAMING TO ORGANIZATIONAL-BEHAVIOR [J].
BAZERMAN, MH .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 1984, 10 (03) :333-343
[8]  
Bettman J., 1979, INFORM PROCESSING TH
[9]   ESCALATING COMMITMENT TO A FAILING COURSE OF ACTION - SEPARATING THE ROLES OF CHOICE AND JUSTIFICATION [J].
BOBOCEL, DR ;
MEYER, JP .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 1994, 79 (03) :360-363
[10]   Stickier priors: The effects of nonanalytic versus analytic thinking in new product forecasting [J].
Bolton, LE .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 2003, 40 (01) :65-79