Letter position coding in printed word perception: Effects of repeated and transposed letters

被引:235
作者
Schoonbaert, S
Grainger, J
机构
[1] Univ Aix Marseille 1, Lab Psychol Cognit, F-13621 Aix En Provence, France
[2] State Univ Ghent, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
[3] CNRS, Aix En Provence, France
来源
LANGUAGE AND COGNITIVE PROCESSES | 2004年 / 19卷 / 03期
关键词
D O I
10.1080/01690960344000198
中图分类号
H0 [语言学];
学科分类号
030303 ; 0501 ; 050102 ;
摘要
We report four experiments investigating the effects of repeated and transposed letters in orthographic processing. Orthographically related primes were formed by removing one letter from the target word, by transposing two adjacent letters, or by replacing two adjacent letters with different letters. Robust masked priming in a lexical decision task was found for primes formed by removing a single letter (e.g., mircle -MIRACLE), and this was not influenced by whether or not the prime contained a letter repetition (e.g., balace vs. balnce as a prime for BALANCE ). Target words containing a repeated letter tended to be harder to respond to than words without a letter repetition, but the nonwords formed by removing a repeated letter (e.g., BALNCE) were no harder to reject than nonwords formed by removing a non-repeated letter (e.g., MIRCLE, BALACE). Significant transposition priming effects were found for 7-letter words (e.g., sevrice -SERVICE), and these priming effects did not vary as a function of the position of the transposition (initial, final, or inner letter pair). Priming effects disappeared when primes were formed by replacing the two transposed letters with different letters (e.g., sedlice -SERVICE), and five-letter words only showed priming effects with inner letter transpositions (e.g., ponit -POINT). We present a revised "open-bigram" scheme for letter position coding that accounts for these data.
引用
收藏
页码:333 / 367
页数:35
相关论文
共 32 条
[11]  
Grossberg S., 1978, PROG THEOR BIOL, V5, P233
[12]   Phonology, reading acquisition, and dyslexia: Insights from connectionist models [J].
Harm, MW ;
Seidenberg, MS .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1999, 106 (03) :491-528
[13]   ORTHOGRAPHIC PROCESSING IN VISUAL WORD IDENTIFICATION [J].
HUMPHREYS, GW ;
EVETT, LJ ;
QUINLAN, PT .
COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 1990, 22 (04) :517-560
[14]  
Jacobs AM, 1998, SCI PSYCH S, P147
[15]   AN INTERACTIVE ACTIVATION MODEL OF CONTEXT EFFECTS IN LETTER PERCEPTION .1. AN ACCOUNT OF BASIC FINDINGS [J].
MCCLELLAND, JL ;
RUMELHART, DE .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1981, 88 (05) :375-407
[16]  
MOZER MC, 1987, ATTENTION PERFORM, V12, P83
[17]  
New B, 2001, ANN PSYCHOL, V101, P447
[18]   AN ACTIVATION VERIFICATION MODEL FOR LETTER AND WORD RECOGNITION - THE WORD-SUPERIORITY EFFECT [J].
PAAP, KR ;
NEWSOME, SL ;
MCDONALD, JE ;
SCHVANEVELDT, RW .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1982, 89 (05) :573-594
[19]   Does "whole-word shape" play a role in visual word recognition? [J].
Perea, M ;
Rosa, E .
PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 2002, 64 (05) :785-794
[20]  
PEREA M, 2003, MASKED PRIMING STATE