Diagnosis of breast cancer: Contribution of US as an adjunct to mammography

被引:245
作者
Zonderland, HM
Coerkamp, EG
Hermans, J
van de Vijver, MJ
van Voorthuisen, AE
机构
[1] Leiden Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, NL-2333 ZA Leiden, Netherlands
[2] Leiden Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Med Stat, NL-2333 ZA Leiden, Netherlands
[3] Leiden Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Pathol, NL-2333 ZA Leiden, Netherlands
[4] Med Ctr Haaglanden Westeinde, Dept Radiol, The Hague, Netherlands
关键词
breast neoplasms; diagnosis; US; receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve;
D O I
10.1148/radiology.213.2.r99nv05413
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
PURPOSE: To determine the value of ultrasonography (US) as an adjunct to mammography for the diagnosis of breast cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a 2-year prospective study, 4,811 mammograms were classified according to level of suspicion of malignancy. Targeted US was performed to analyze (a) circumscribed lesions, possibly cysts; (b) palpable lesions visible at mammography; (c) palpable lesions not visible at mammography; and (d) nonpalpable lesions visible at mammography. After US was performed in 1,103 cases (23%), cases were reclassified for level of suspicion. RESULTS: in 338 cases, breast cancer was diagnosed. The sensitivity of mammography for all 4,811 cases was 83%; the specificity was 97%. After US, the combined sensitivity increased to 91%, with a specificity of 98%. The increase was significant (P < .001). The increase in sensitivity was highest among women younger than 50 years. The positive predictive value for mammography was high (72%), which reflects a high threshold for biopsy; this may have augmented the yield of US. CONCLUSION: The use of US as an adjunct to mammography resulted in an increase in diagnostic accuracy. Its contribution to the diagnosis of breast cancer in this study was 7.4%.
引用
收藏
页码:413 / 422
页数:10
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]  
*AM JOINT COMM CAN, 1997, AJCC CANC STAG MA
[2]  
BASSETT LW, 1992, RADIOL CLIN N AM, V30, P93
[3]   BREAST DISEASES - COLOR DOPPLER US IN DIFFERENTIAL-DIAGNOSIS [J].
COSGROVE, DO ;
KEDAR, RP ;
BAMBER, JC ;
ALMURRANI, B ;
DAVEY, JBN ;
FISHER, C ;
MCKINNA, JA ;
SVENSSON, WE ;
TOHNO, E ;
VAGIOS, E ;
ALSANJARI, NA .
RADIOLOGY, 1993, 189 (01) :99-104
[4]   MAMMOGRAPHIC ACCURACY AND PATIENT AGE - A STUDY OF 297 PATIENTS UNDERGOING BREAST BIOPSY [J].
DAVIES, RJ ;
AHERN, RP ;
PARSONS, CA ;
MOSKOVIC, EC .
CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 1993, 47 (01) :23-25
[5]   Sensitivity, specificity and predictive values of breast imaging in the detection of cancer [J].
Duijm, LEM ;
Guit, GL ;
Zaat, JOM ;
Koomen, AR ;
Willebrand, D .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1997, 76 (03) :377-381
[6]  
EDEIKEN S, 1988, CANCER, V61, P263, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19880115)61:2<263::AID-CNCR2820610211>3.0.CO
[7]  
2-Z
[8]  
FEIG SA, 1992, RADIOL CLIN N AM, V30, P67
[9]  
FRANCHEBOUD J, 1998, INT J CANCER, V75, P694
[10]   Characteristics of breast carcinomas missed by screening radiologists [J].
Goergen, SK ;
Evans, J ;
Cohen, GPB ;
MacMillan, JH .
RADIOLOGY, 1997, 204 (01) :131-135