Hydrocortisone with or without mitoxantrone in men with hormone-refractory prostate cancer: Results of the Cancer and Leukemia Group B 9182 study

Purpose: Approximately 40,000 men die each year of hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC). The results of treatment with chemotherapy have been disappointing to date, with no trials demonstrating a benefit with respect to survival duration. Corticosteroids and mitoxantrone each have been shown to be active agents in this disease. The purpose of this study was to demonstrate an advantage of mitoxantrone and hydrocortisone (M+H) over hydrocortisone alone with respect to survival duration. Patients and Methods: Two hundred forty-two patients with HRPC were randomized to receive either M+H or hydrocortisone alone. patients were monitored for survival, time to disease progression, time to treatment failure, response, and quality-of-life (QOL) parameters. Results: Treatment in both arms was well tolerated, Although there wets a delay in time to treatment failure and disease progression in favor of M+H over hydrocortisone alone, there war no difference in overall survival (12.3 months for M+H v 12.6 months for hydrocortisone alone). There was an indication that QOL was better with M+H, in particular with respect to pain control. Conclusion: M+H generated more frequent responses and a delay in both time to treatment failure and disease progression compared with hydrocortisone alone. In addition, there wets a possible benefit of M+H with respect to pain control over hydrocortisone alone. No improvement in survival was observed. Although M+H could be viewed as a palliative option for patients with HRPC, new drugs and novel strategies are needed to improve survival for this disease. (C) 1999 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.