Hybrid integration of Multilayer Perceptron Neural Networks and machine learning ensembles for landslide susceptibility assessment at Himalayan area (India) using GIS

被引:463
作者
Binh Thai Pham [1 ,2 ]
Dieu Tien Bui [3 ]
Prakash, Indra [4 ]
Dholakia, M. B. [5 ]
机构
[1] Gujarat Technol Univ, Dept Civil Engn, Nr Visat 3 Rd, Ahmadabad 382424, Gujarat, India
[2] Univ Transport Technol, Dept Geotech Engn, 54 Trieu Khuc, Thanh Xuan, Ha Noi, Vietnam
[3] Univ Coll Southeast Norway, Dept Business Adm & Comp Sci, Geog Informat Syst Grp, Hallvard Eikas Plass 1, N-3800 Bo I Telemark, Norway
[4] Govt Gujarat, Bhaskarcharya Inst Space Applicat & GeoInformat B, Dept Sci & Technol, Gandhinagar, India
[5] Gujarat Technol Univ, LDCE, Dept Civil Engn, Ahmadabad 380015, Gujarat, India
关键词
Landslides; Ensemble techniques; Multilayer Perceptron Neural Network; Himalaya; India; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINE; EVIDENTIAL BELIEF FUNCTIONS; RANDOM SUBSPACE METHOD; DECISION-TREE MODEL; 3 GORGES AREA; LOGISTIC-REGRESSION; CONDITIONAL-PROBABILITY; PREDICTION CAPABILITY; CLASSIFIER ENSEMBLE; SPATIAL PREDICTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.catena.2016.09.007
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
The main objective of this study is to evaluate and compare the performance of landslide models using machine learning ensemble technique for landslide susceptibility assessment. This technique is a combination of ensemble methods (AdaBoost, Bagging, Dagging, MultiBoost, Rotation Forest, and Random SubSpace) and the base classifier of Multiple Perceptron Neural Networks (MLP Neural Nets). Ensemble techniques have been widely applied in other fields; however, their application is still rare in the assessment of landslide problems. Meanwhile, MLP Neural Nets, which is known as an artificial neural network, has been applied widely and efficiently in landslide problems. In the present study, landslide models of part Himalayan area (India) have been constructed and validated. For the evaluation and comparison of these models, receiver operating characteristic curve and Chi Square test methods have been applied. Overall, all landslide models performed well in landslide susuceptibility assessment but the performance of the MultiBoost model is the highest (AUC = 0.886), followed by Dagging model (AUC = 0.885), the Rotation Forest model (AUC = 0.882), the Bagging and Random SubSpace models (AUC = 0.881), and the AdaBoost model (AUC = 0.876), respectively. Moreover, machine learning ensemble models have improved significantly the performance of the base classifier of MLP Neural Nets (AUC = 0.874). Analysis of results indicates that landslide models using machine learning ensemble frameworks are promising methods which can be used as alternatives of individual base classifiers for landslide susceptibility assessment of other prone areas. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:52 / 63
页数:12
相关论文
共 89 条
  • [51] Landslide susceptibility mapping based on rough set theory and support vector machines: A case of the Three Gorges area, China
    Peng, Ling
    Niu, Ruiqing
    Huang, Bo
    Wu, Xueling
    Zhao, Yannan
    Ye, Runqing
    [J]. GEOMORPHOLOGY, 2014, 204 : 287 - 301
  • [52] Pham BT., 2015, Int. J. Eng. Res. Technol, V4, P338
  • [53] Landslide susceptibility maps comparing frequency ratio and artificial neural networks: a case study from the Nepal Himalaya
    Poudyal, Chandra Prakash
    Chang, Chandong
    Oh, Hyun-Joo
    Lee, Saro
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES, 2010, 61 (05) : 1049 - 1064
  • [54] Landslide susceptibility mapping using support vector machine and GIS at the Golestan Province, Iran
    Pourghasemi, Hamid Reza
    Jirandeh, Abbas Goli
    Pradhan, Biswajeet
    Xu, Chong
    Gokceoglu, Candan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCE, 2013, 122 (02) : 349 - 369
  • [55] Application of weights-of-evidence and certainty factor models and their comparison in landslide susceptibility mapping at Haraz watershed, Iran
    Pourghasemi, Hamid Reza
    Pradhan, Biswajeet
    Gokceoglu, Candan
    Mohammadi, Majid
    Moradi, Hamid Reza
    [J]. ARABIAN JOURNAL OF GEOSCIENCES, 2013, 6 (07) : 2351 - 2365
  • [56] Application of fuzzy logic and analytical hierarchy process (AHP) to landslide susceptibility mapping at Haraz watershed, Iran
    Pourghasemi, Hamid Reza
    Pradhan, Biswajeet
    Gokceoglu, Candan
    [J]. NATURAL HAZARDS, 2012, 63 (02) : 965 - 996
  • [57] Landslide susceptibility mapping using index of entropy and conditional probability models in GIS: Safarood Basin, Iran
    Pourghasemi, Hamid Reza
    Mohammady, Majid
    Pradhan, Biswajeet
    [J]. CATENA, 2012, 97 : 71 - 84
  • [58] A comparative assessment of prediction capabilities of Dempster-Shafer and Weights-of-evidence models in landslide susceptibility mapping using GIS
    Pourghasemi, Hamidreza
    Pradhan, Biswajeet
    Gokceoglu, Candan
    Moezzi, Kimia Deylami
    [J]. GEOMATICS NATURAL HAZARDS & RISK, 2013, 4 (02) : 93 - 118
  • [59] Landslide Susceptibility mapping of a catchment area using frequency ratio, fuzzy logic and multivariate logistic regression approaches
    Pradhan, B.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE INDIAN SOCIETY OF REMOTE SENSING, 2010, 38 (02) : 301 - 320
  • [60] Land subsidence susceptibility mapping at Kinta Valley (Malaysia) using the evidential belief function model in GIS
    Pradhan, Biswajeet
    Abokharima, Mohammed Hasan
    Jebur, Mustafa Neamah
    Tehrany, Mahyat Shafapour
    [J]. NATURAL HAZARDS, 2014, 73 (02) : 1019 - 1042