A functional model of hierarchy: Why, how, and when vertical differentiation enhances group performance

被引:241
作者
Halevy, Nir [1 ]
Chou, Eileen Y. [2 ]
Galinsky, Adam D. [3 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Grad Sch Business, 518 Mem Way, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[2] Northwestern Univ, Kellogg Sch Management, Management & Organizat, Evanston, IL 60208 USA
[3] Northwestern Univ, Kellogg Sch Management, Ethics & Decis Management, Evanston, IL 60208 USA
关键词
groups/teams; hierarchy; leadership; motivation; power; status; TRANSACTIVE MEMORY; ORGANIZATIONAL IDENTIFICATION; SOCIAL IDENTITY; PAY DISPERSION; POWER; SELF; LEADERSHIP; TASK; IMPACT; PERSONALITY;
D O I
10.1177/2041386610380991
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
We propose that hierarchy is such a prevalent form of social organization because it is functionally adaptive and enhances a group's chances of survival and success. We identify five ways in which hierarchy facilitates organizational success. Hierarchy (a) creates a psychologically rewarding environment; (b) motivates performance through hierarchy-related incentives; (c) capitalizes on the complementary psychological effects of having versus lacking power; (d) supports division of labor, and, as a result, coordination; and (e) reduces conflict and enhances voluntary cooperation. Overall, we specify a causal model linking organizational structure (hierarchy), processes (motivation, leadership, coordination, and cooperation) and outcomes (performance). We also discuss three variables that moderate the need for and acceptance of hierarchy-(a) the level of task interdependence; (b) the legitimacy of hierarchical differentiation; and (c) the alignment of different bases of hierarchy-and link them to the mediating processes through which hierarchy facilitates organizational success.
引用
收藏
页码:32 / 52
页数:21
相关论文
共 152 条
[1]  
ADAMS JS, 1965, ADV EXP SOC PSYCHOL, V2, P267
[2]   The other "authoritarian personality" [J].
Altemeyer, B .
ADVANCES IN EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, VOL 30, 1998, 30 :47-92
[3]   What breaks a leader: The curvilinear relation between assertiveness and leadership [J].
Ames, Daniel R. ;
Flynn, Francis J. .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2007, 92 (02) :307-324
[4]   Who attains social status? Effects of personality and physical attractiveness in social groups [J].
Anderson, C ;
John, OP ;
Keltner, D ;
Kring, AM .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2001, 81 (01) :116-132
[5]  
Anderson C., EFFECTS HIE IN PRESS
[6]   Personality and organizational culture as determinants of influence [J].
Anderson, Cameron ;
Flynn, Francis J. ;
Spataro, Sandra E. .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2008, 93 (03) :702-710
[7]   Knowing your place: Self-perceptions of status in face-to-face groups [J].
Anderson, Cameron ;
Srivastava, Sanjay ;
Beer, Jennifer S. ;
Spataro, Sandra E. ;
Chatman, Jennifer A. .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2006, 91 (06) :1094-1110
[8]   Why Do Dominant Personalities Attain Influence in Face-to-Face Groups? The Competence-Signaling Effects of Trait Dominance [J].
Anderson, Cameron ;
Kilduff, Gavin J. .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2009, 96 (02) :491-503
[9]  
[Anonymous], PERSONALITY SOCIAL P
[10]  
[Anonymous], 2008, Understanding human values