Why Do Dominant Personalities Attain Influence in Face-to-Face Groups? The Competence-Signaling Effects of Trait Dominance

被引:404
作者
Anderson, Cameron [1 ]
Kilduff, Gavin J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Berkeley, Haas Sch Business, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
关键词
dominance; influence; power; status; competence; NONVERBAL BEHAVIOR; LEADERSHIP; PERCEPTIONS; PERFORMANCE; INTELLIGENCE; CONSISTENCY; POSITION; MODEL; POWER; CUES;
D O I
10.1037/a0014201
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Individuals high in the personality trait dominance consistently attain high levels of influence in groups, Why they do is unclear, however, because most group theories assert that people cannot attain influence simply by behaving assertively and forcefully; rather, they need to possess superior task abilities and leadership skills, In the present research, the authors proposed that individuals high in trait dominance attain influence because they behave in ways that make them appear competent-even when the) actually lack competence. Two studies examined task groups using a social relations analysis of peer perceptions (D. A. Kenny & L. LaVoie, 1984). The authors found that individuals higher in trait dominance were rated as more competent by fellow group members, outside peer observers, and research staff members, even after controlling for individuals' actual abilities. Furthermore, frequency counts of discrete behaviors showed that dominance predicts the enactment of competence-signaling behaviors, which in turn predicts peer ratings of competence. These findings extend researchers' understanding of trait dominance, hierarchies in groups, and perceptions of competence and abilities.
引用
收藏
页码:491 / 503
页数:13
相关论文
共 76 条
[1]   EXTRAVERSION AND THE ABILITY TO DECODE NONVERBAL-COMMUNICATION [J].
AKERT, RM ;
PANTER, AT .
PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 1988, 9 (06) :965-972
[2]   The experience of power: Examining the effects of power on approach and inhibition tendencies [J].
Anderson, C ;
Berdahl, JL .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2002, 83 (06) :1362-1377
[3]   Who attains social status? Effects of personality and physical attractiveness in social groups [J].
Anderson, C ;
John, OP ;
Keltner, D ;
Kring, AM .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2001, 81 (01) :116-132
[4]   Personality and organizational culture as determinants of influence [J].
Anderson, Cameron ;
Flynn, Francis J. ;
Spataro, Sandra E. .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2008, 93 (03) :702-710
[5]   Knowing your place: Self-perceptions of status in face-to-face groups [J].
Anderson, Cameron ;
Srivastava, Sanjay ;
Beer, Jennifer S. ;
Spataro, Sandra E. ;
Chatman, Jennifer A. .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2006, 91 (06) :1094-1110
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1964, Exchange and Power
[7]  
[Anonymous], SOREMO VERSION UNPUB
[8]  
[Anonymous], CPI MANUAL
[9]  
[Anonymous], 1993, LEADERSHIP Q, DOI DOI 10.1016/1048-9843(93)90003-C
[10]   DISPOSITIONAL AND SITUATIONAL INFLUENCES ON DOMINANCE BEHAVIOR IN SMALL-GROUPS [J].
ARIES, EJ ;
GOLD, C ;
WEIGEL, RH .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1983, 44 (04) :779-786