Why Do Dominant Personalities Attain Influence in Face-to-Face Groups? The Competence-Signaling Effects of Trait Dominance

被引:404
作者
Anderson, Cameron [1 ]
Kilduff, Gavin J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Berkeley, Haas Sch Business, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
关键词
dominance; influence; power; status; competence; NONVERBAL BEHAVIOR; LEADERSHIP; PERCEPTIONS; PERFORMANCE; INTELLIGENCE; CONSISTENCY; POSITION; MODEL; POWER; CUES;
D O I
10.1037/a0014201
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Individuals high in the personality trait dominance consistently attain high levels of influence in groups, Why they do is unclear, however, because most group theories assert that people cannot attain influence simply by behaving assertively and forcefully; rather, they need to possess superior task abilities and leadership skills, In the present research, the authors proposed that individuals high in trait dominance attain influence because they behave in ways that make them appear competent-even when the) actually lack competence. Two studies examined task groups using a social relations analysis of peer perceptions (D. A. Kenny & L. LaVoie, 1984). The authors found that individuals higher in trait dominance were rated as more competent by fellow group members, outside peer observers, and research staff members, even after controlling for individuals' actual abilities. Furthermore, frequency counts of discrete behaviors showed that dominance predicts the enactment of competence-signaling behaviors, which in turn predicts peer ratings of competence. These findings extend researchers' understanding of trait dominance, hierarchies in groups, and perceptions of competence and abilities.
引用
收藏
页码:491 / 503
页数:13
相关论文
共 76 条
[11]   THE BIG 5 PERSONALITY DIMENSIONS AND JOB-PERFORMANCE - A METAANALYSIS [J].
BARRICK, MR ;
MOUNT, MK .
PERSONNEL PSYCHOLOGY, 1991, 44 (01) :1-26
[12]  
Bass B.M., 1981, Bass and Stogdill's handbook of leadership: A survey of theory and research
[13]   CONSISTENCY OF INDIVIDUAL LEADERSHIP POSITION IN SMALL GROUPS OF VARYING MEMBERSHIP [J].
BELL, GB ;
FRENCH, RL .
JOURNAL OF ABNORMAL AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1950, 45 (04) :764-767
[14]   STATUS CHARACTERISTICS AND SOCIAL INTERACTION [J].
BERGER, J ;
ZELDITCH, M ;
COHEN, BP .
AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1972, 37 (03) :241-&
[15]  
Blau P., 1962, FORMAL ORG COMP APPR
[16]   Thin slices of behavior as cues of personality and intelligence [J].
Borkenau, P ;
Mauer, N ;
Riemann, R ;
Spinath, FM ;
Angleitner, A .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2004, 86 (04) :599-614
[17]   THE FREQUENCY CONCEPT OF DISPOSITION - DOMINANCE AND PROTOTYPICALLY DOMINANT ACTS [J].
BUSS, DM ;
CRAIK, KH .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY, 1980, 48 (03) :379-392
[19]   NONVERBAL BEHAVIOR, GENDER, AND INFLUENCE [J].
CARLI, LL ;
LOEBER, CC ;
LAFLEUR, SJ .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1995, 68 (06) :1030-1041
[20]  
Cartwright D., 1959, Studies in social power, P150