Why Do Dominant Personalities Attain Influence in Face-to-Face Groups? The Competence-Signaling Effects of Trait Dominance

被引:409
作者
Anderson, Cameron [1 ]
Kilduff, Gavin J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Berkeley, Haas Sch Business, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
关键词
dominance; influence; power; status; competence; NONVERBAL BEHAVIOR; LEADERSHIP; PERCEPTIONS; PERFORMANCE; INTELLIGENCE; CONSISTENCY; POSITION; MODEL; POWER; CUES;
D O I
10.1037/a0014201
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Individuals high in the personality trait dominance consistently attain high levels of influence in groups, Why they do is unclear, however, because most group theories assert that people cannot attain influence simply by behaving assertively and forcefully; rather, they need to possess superior task abilities and leadership skills, In the present research, the authors proposed that individuals high in trait dominance attain influence because they behave in ways that make them appear competent-even when the) actually lack competence. Two studies examined task groups using a social relations analysis of peer perceptions (D. A. Kenny & L. LaVoie, 1984). The authors found that individuals higher in trait dominance were rated as more competent by fellow group members, outside peer observers, and research staff members, even after controlling for individuals' actual abilities. Furthermore, frequency counts of discrete behaviors showed that dominance predicts the enactment of competence-signaling behaviors, which in turn predicts peer ratings of competence. These findings extend researchers' understanding of trait dominance, hierarchies in groups, and perceptions of competence and abilities.
引用
收藏
页码:491 / 503
页数:13
相关论文
共 76 条
[21]  
DePaulo B.M., 1998, HDB SOCIAL PSYCHOL, P3
[22]   RELATION OF "SOCIAL DOMINANCE" TO GENERAL INTELLIGENCE [J].
Dodge, Arthur F. .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1937, 28 (05) :387-390
[23]   PERSONALITY VARIABLES AFFECTING WAIS SCORES [J].
DONAHUE, D ;
SATTLER, JM .
JOURNAL OF CONSULTING AND CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1971, 36 (03) :441-&
[24]   TASK CUES, DOMINANCE CUES, AND INFLUENCE IN TASK GROUPS [J].
DRISKELL, JE ;
OLMSTEAD, B ;
SALAS, E .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 1993, 78 (01) :51-60
[25]   STATUS, EXPECTATIONS, AND BEHAVIOR - A META-ANALYTIC REVIEW AND TEST OF THE THEORY [J].
DRISKELL, JE ;
MULLEN, B .
PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY BULLETIN, 1990, 16 (03) :541-553
[26]   AMBIGUITY AND SELF-EVALUATION - THE ROLE OF IDIOSYNCRATIC TRAIT DEFINITIONS IN SELF-SERVING ASSESSMENTS OF ABILITY [J].
DUNNING, D ;
MEYEROWITZ, JA ;
HOLZBERG, AD .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1989, 57 (06) :1082-1090
[27]   THE CONSISTENCY OF RATINGS BY PEERS [J].
FISKE, DW ;
COX, JA .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 1960, 44 (01) :11-17
[28]   A very brief measure of the Big-Five personality domains [J].
Gosling, SD ;
Rentfrow, PJ ;
Swann, WB .
JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN PERSONALITY, 2003, 37 (06) :504-528
[29]  
Gough H.G., 1949, Journal of Educational Psychology, V40, P65
[30]   ''Subordination'' and nonverbal sensitivity: A study and synthesis of findings based on trait measures [J].
Hall, JA ;
Halberstadt, AG ;
OBrien, CE .
SEX ROLES, 1997, 37 (5-6) :295-317