Removing distortions in the US ethanol market: What does it imply for the United States and Brazil?

被引:55
作者
Elobeid, Amani [1 ]
Tokgoz, Simla [1 ]
机构
[1] Iowa State Univ, Ctr Agr & Rural Dev, Ames, IA 50011 USA
关键词
biofuels; ethanol; renewable fuels; trade liberalization;
D O I
10.1111/j.1467-8276.2008.01158.x
中图分类号
F3 [农业经济];
学科分类号
0202 ; 020205 ; 1203 ;
摘要
We analyze the impact of trade liberalization and removal of the federal tax credit in the United States on ethanol markets using a multimarket international ethanol model. We find that U.S. trade barriers have been effective in protecting the ethanol industry. Under current policy, there is separability of the U.S. ethanol market from world markets. With trade liberalization, the ethanol market deepens, making it less susceptible to price volatility. The effect of trade liberalization extends beyond ethanol markets. affecting agricultural markets. ne results show that the impact of removal of the tax credit overrides the impact of the tariff removal.
引用
收藏
页码:918 / 932
页数:15
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]   Changing the US sugar program into a standard crop program: Consequences under the North American Free Trade Agreement and Doha [J].
Abler, David ;
Beghin, John C. ;
Blandford, David ;
Elobeid, Amani .
REVIEW OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2008, 30 (01) :82-102
[2]  
*ANFAVEA, 2005, BRAZ AUT IND YB
[3]  
[Anonymous], JOINT C U MINN UNPUB
[4]  
[Anonymous], REV AGR EC
[5]  
[Anonymous], CHOICES
[6]   The cost of the US sugar program revisited [J].
Beghin, JC ;
El Osta, B ;
Cherlow, JR ;
Mohanty, S .
CONTEMPORARY ECONOMIC POLICY, 2003, 21 (01) :106-116
[7]  
Bolling C., 2001, Sugar and Sweetener Situation and Outlook Report, P14
[8]  
Brown S., 2006, J INT AGR TRADE DEV, V2, P87
[9]  
COLTRAIN D, 2001, RISK PROF C KANS STA
[10]   Impacts of trade liberalizations under the Uruguay Round on the world sugar market [J].
Devadoss, S ;
Kropf, J .
AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 1996, 15 (02) :83-96