Climate change at the landscape scale: predicting fine-grained spatial heterogeneity in warming and potential refugia for vegetation

被引:132
作者
Ashcroft, Michael B. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Chisholm, Laurie A. [1 ]
French, Kristine O. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wollongong, GeoQuEST Res Ctr, Sch Earth & Environm Sci, Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia
[2] Univ Wollongong, Sch Biol Sci, Inst Conservat Biol & Law, Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia
[3] Australian Museum, Sydney, NSW 2010, Australia
关键词
bioclimatic envelope; climate change; elevation; exposure; humidity; refugia; species distribution model; temperature; vegetation; wind; SPECIES DISTRIBUTIONS; ENVELOPE MODELS; BIODIVERSITY; PROJECTIONS; IMPACTS; ASSESSMENTS; DIVERSITY; NICHE;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2486.2008.01762.x
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Current predictions of how species will respond to climate change are based on coarse-grained climate surfaces or idealized scenarios of uniform warming. These predictions may erroneously estimate the risk of extinction because they neglect to consider spatially heterogenous warming at the landscape scale or identify refugia where species can persist despite unfavourable regional climate. To address this issue, we investigated the heterogeneity in warming that has occurred in a 10 km x 10km area from 1972 to 2007. We developed estimates by combining long-term daily observations from a limited number of weather stations with a more spatially comprehensive dataset (40 sites) obtained during 2005-2006. We found that the spatial distribution of warming was greater inland, at lower elevations, away from streams, and at sites exposed to the northwest (NW). These differences corresponded with changes in weather patterns, such as an increasing frequency of hot, dry NW winds. As plant species were biased in the topographic and geographic locations they occupied, these differences meant that some species experienced more warming than others, and are at greater risk from climate change. This species bias could not be detected at coarser scales. The uneven seasonal nature of warming (e. g. more warming in winter, minimums increased more than maximums) means that climate change predictions will vary according to which predictors are selected in species distribution models. Models based on a limited set of predictors will produce erroneous predictions when the correct limiting factor is not selected, and this is difficult to avoid when temperature predictors are correlated because they are produced using elevation-sensitive interpolations. The results reinforce the importance of down-scaling coarse-grained (similar to 50 km) temperature surfaces, and suggest that the accuracy of this process could be improved by considering regional weather patterns (wind speed, direction, humidity) and topographic exposure to key wind directions.
引用
收藏
页码:656 / 667
页数:12
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [11] FULLER L, 1995, WOLLONGONGS NATIVE T
  • [12] Does seasonal fine-tuning of climatic variables improve the performance of bioclimatic envelope models for migratory birds?
    Heikkinen, R. K.
    Luoto, M.
    Virkkala, R.
    [J]. DIVERSITY AND DISTRIBUTIONS, 2006, 12 (05) : 502 - 510
  • [13] Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas
    Hijmans, RJ
    Cameron, SE
    Parra, JL
    Jones, PG
    Jarvis, A
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLIMATOLOGY, 2005, 25 (15) : 1965 - 1978
  • [14] Climatic range sizes of Eucalyptus species in relation to future climate change
    Hughes, L
    Cawsey, EM
    Westoby, M
    [J]. GLOBAL ECOLOGY AND BIOGEOGRAPHY LETTERS, 1996, 5 (01): : 23 - 29
  • [15] Model-based assessments of climate change effects on forests: A critical review
    Loehle, C
    LeBlanc, D
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 1996, 90 (01) : 1 - 31
  • [16] Disregarding topographical heterogeneity biases species turnover assessments based on bioclimatic models
    Luoto, Miska
    Heikkinen, R. K.
    [J]. GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY, 2008, 14 (03) : 483 - 494
  • [17] NPWS, 2002, NAT VEG ILL ESC COAS
  • [18] Climate change and the migration capacity of species
    Pearson, RG
    [J]. TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 2006, 21 (03) : 111 - 113
  • [19] Bioclimate envelope models: what they detect and what they hide - response to Hampe (2004)
    Pearson, RG
    Dawson, TP
    [J]. GLOBAL ECOLOGY AND BIOGEOGRAPHY, 2004, 13 (05): : 471 - 473
  • [20] Predicting the impacts of climate change on the distribution of species: are bioclimate envelope models useful?
    Pearson, RG
    Dawson, TP
    [J]. GLOBAL ECOLOGY AND BIOGEOGRAPHY, 2003, 12 (05): : 361 - 371