The influence of item difficulty on the relationship between eyewitness confidence and accuracy

被引:34
作者
Kebbell, MR [1 ]
Wagstaff, GF [1 ]
Covey, JA [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV LIVERPOOL,DEPT PSYCHOL,LIVERPOOL,MERSEYSIDE,ENGLAND
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.2044-8295.1996.tb02614.x
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Research indicates that the confidence eyewitnesses express in information heavily influences both the investigative process and the credence which jurors give to eyewitness testimony. However, studies in this area suggest that there is either no relationship or only a small positive relationship between eyewitness confidence and accuracy. Nevertheless, it is argued here that researchers may have paid insufficient attention to the issue of item difficulty, and have used statistical procedures that fail to consider highly accurate responses with low variance. In an attempt to address these issues, two experiments were conducted which measured confidence-accuracy in response to information seen in video films. In each case questions were used that ranged in difficulty. Higher confidence-accuracy correlations than are usually reported were found in both experiments. Furthermore, when participants were 'absolutely certain' that a piece of information was correct, they almost invariably were accurate.
引用
收藏
页码:653 / 662
页数:10
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]  
Ajzen I., 1988, ATTITUDES PERSONALIT
[2]   CORRELATION OF EYEWITNESS ACCURACY AND CONFIDENCE - OPTIMALITY HYPOTHESIS REVISITED [J].
BOTHWELL, RK ;
BRIGHAM, JC ;
DEFFENBACHER, KA .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 1987, 72 (04) :691-695
[3]   OPINIONS OF ATTORNEYS AND LAW-ENFORCEMENT PERSONNEL ON THE ACCURACY OF EYEWITNESS IDENTIFICATIONS [J].
BRIGHAM, JC ;
WOLFSKEIL, MP .
LAW AND HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 1983, 7 (04) :337-349
[4]   HANDS UP - A STUDY OF WITNESSES EMOTIONAL-REACTIONS AND MEMORIES ASSOCIATED WITH BANK ROBBERIES [J].
CHRISTIANSON, SA ;
HUBINETTE, B .
APPLIED COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 1993, 7 (05) :365-379
[5]   JUROR DECISION-MAKING IN EYEWITNESS IDENTIFICATION CASES [J].
CUTLER, BL ;
PENROD, SD ;
STUVE, TE .
LAW AND HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 1988, 12 (01) :41-55
[6]   JUROR SENSITIVITY TO EYEWITNESS IDENTIFICATION EVIDENCE [J].
CUTLER, BL ;
PENROD, SD ;
DEXTER, HR .
LAW AND HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 1990, 14 (02) :185-191
[7]  
Deffenbacher KA., 1980, Law Hum Behav, V4, P243, DOI [DOI 10.1037/0021-9010.72.4.691, 10.1007/BF01040617, DOI 10.1007/BF01040617]
[8]   THE IMPACT OF GENERAL VERSUS SPECIFIC EXPERT TESTIMONY AND EYEWITNESS CONFIDENCE UPON MOCK JUROR JUDGMENT [J].
FOX, SG ;
WALTERS, HA .
LAW AND HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 1986, 10 (03) :215-228
[9]  
FRUZZETTI AE, 1992, ASPECTS MEMORY, V1, P18
[10]  
Gruneberg M M, 1993, Memory, V1, P185, DOI 10.1080/09658219308258231