Parabrachial area: Electrophysiological evidence for an involvement in cold nociception

被引:49
作者
Menendez, L
Bester, H
Besson, JM
Bernard, JF
机构
[1] INSERM, U161, UNITE RECH PHYSIOPHARMACOL SYST NERVEUX, F-75014 PARIS, FRANCE
[2] ECOLE PRAT HAUTES ETUD, F-75014 PARIS, FRANCE
关键词
D O I
10.1152/jn.1996.75.5.2099
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
1. Thirty-five percent of 120 neurons recorded extracellularly in the parabrachial (PB) area of anesthetized rats responded to a peripheral cold stimulus (0 degrees C). The cold-sensitive neurons were located in the lateral PB area, and most of those exhibiting a strong response to cold stimuli were inside or in close vicinity to the area receiving a high density of projections from superficial neurons of the dorsal horn. 2. The receptive fields for cold stimulation often were restricted to one or two parts of the body with a contralateral predominance for the limbs. No side predominance was observed for the face. 3. From a low spontaneous activity (10th percentile < median < 90th percentile: 0.1 < 1.5 < 5 Hz), the PB neurons responded to cold noxious stimuli (0 degrees C water bath or waterjet, 20 s), without observable delay, with a sustained discharge. The mean maximal response to the stimulus was 16.1 +/- 1.2 Hz (mean +/- SE; n = 42). 4. About one-half (45%) of these cold-sensitive neurons were activated specifically by cold stimulation and did not respond or were inhibited by noxious heat and/or pinch. The remaining (55%) cold-sensitive neurons were also driven by heat and/or pinch. 5. The cold-sensitive neurons exhibited a clear capacity to encode cold stimuli in the noxious range: the stimulus-response function was always positive and monotonic from 30 to 0 degrees C; the mean curve was linear between 20 and 0 degrees C before plateauing between 0 to -10 degrees C; the mean threshold to cold stimulation was 17.1 +/- 1 degrees C (n = 21) and the mean t(50) was 10.7 +/- 1.1 degrees C (n = 13). 6. The cold-sensitive neurons responded to intense transcutaneous electrical stimulation with an early and/or a late peak of activation, the latencies of which were in the 15-50 ms and 80-170 ms ranges (n = 8), respectively, i.e., compatible with the activation of A delta and C fibers. Interestingly, the cold-specific neurons predominantly responded with a late peak, suggesting these neurons were primarily driven by peripheral C fibers. 7. The intravenous injection of morphine depressed the responses of PB neurons to cold noxious stimuli in a dose-related (1, 3, and 9 mg/kg) and naloxone reversible fashion. The ED(50) value was estimated similar to 2 mg/kg. Furthermore, two populations of neurons could be separated according to their morphine sensitivity. 8. It is concluded that PB cold-nonspecific neurons could be involved in affective-emotional, autonomic and neuroendocrine reactions in response to noxious cold events. The PB cold-specific neurons could be, in addition, involved in some thermoregulatory processes.
引用
收藏
页码:2099 / 2116
页数:18
相关论文
共 118 条
[11]   THE PARABRACHIAL AREA - ELECTROPHYSIOLOGICAL EVIDENCE FOR AN INVOLVEMENT IN VISCERAL NOCICEPTIVE PROCESSES [J].
BERNARD, JF ;
HUANG, GF ;
BESSON, JM .
JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1994, 71 (05) :1646-1660
[12]   A POSSIBLE SPINO (TRIGEMINO)-PONTO-AMYGDALOID PATHWAY FOR PAIN [J].
BERNARD, JF ;
PESCHANSKI, M ;
BESSON, JM .
NEUROSCIENCE LETTERS, 1989, 100 (1-3) :83-88
[13]  
BERNARD JF, 1992, J NEUROPHYSIOL, V68, P551
[14]   THE SPINO(TRIGEMINO)PONTOAMYGDALOID PATHWAY - ELECTROPHYSIOLOGICAL EVIDENCE FOR AN INVOLVEMENT IN PAIN PROCESSES [J].
BERNARD, JF ;
BESSON, JM .
JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1990, 63 (03) :473-490
[15]   ORGANIZATION OF THE EFFERENT PROJECTIONS FROM THE SPINAL CERVICAL ENLARGEMENT TO THE PARABRACHIAL AREA AND PERIAQUEDUCTAL GRAY - A PHA-L STUDY IN THE RAT [J].
BERNARD, JF ;
DALLEL, R ;
RABOISSON, P ;
VILLANUEVA, L ;
LEBARS, D .
JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE NEUROLOGY, 1995, 353 (04) :480-505
[16]   RESPIRATORY SYNCHRONIZING FUNCTION OF NUCLEUS PARABRACHIALIS MEDIALIS - PNEUMOTAXIC MECHANISMS [J].
BERTRAND, F ;
HUGELIN, A .
JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1971, 34 (02) :189-&
[17]   SPINO(TRIGEMINO) PARABRACHIOHYPOTHALAMIC PATHWAY - ELECTROPHYSIOLOGICAL EVIDENCE FOR AN INVOLVEMENT IN PAIN PROCESSES [J].
BESTER, H ;
MENENDEZ, L ;
BESSON, JM ;
BERNARD, JF .
JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1995, 73 (02) :568-585
[18]  
Bester H., 1994, Society for Neuroscience Abstracts, V20, P1571
[19]   SPINAL INPUT TO THE PARABRACHIAL NUCLEUS IN THE CAT [J].
BLOMQVIST, A ;
MA, W ;
BERKLEY, KJ .
BRAIN RESEARCH, 1989, 480 (1-2) :29-36
[20]  
BOULANT JA, 1973, AM J PHYSIOL, V225, P1371, DOI 10.1152/ajplegacy.1973.225.6.1371