Diagnosis of osteoporosis and assessment of fracture risk

被引:1621
作者
Kanis, JA [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sheffield, Sch Med, WHO, Collaborating Ctr Metab Bone Dis, Sheffield S10 2RX, S Yorkshire, England
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0140-6736(02)08761-5
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
The diagnosis of osteoporosis centres on the assessment of bone mineral density (BMD). Osteoporosis Is defined as a BMD 2.5 SD or more below the average value for premenopausal women (T score <-2.5 SD). Severe osteoporosis denotes osteoporosis in the presence of one or more fragility fractures. The same absolute value for BMD used in women can be used in men. The recommended site for diagnosis Is the proximal femur with dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Other sites and validated techniques, however, can be used for fracture prediction. Although hip fracture prediction with BMD alone is at least as good as blood pressure readings to predict stroke, the predictive value of BMD can be enhanced by use of other factors, such as biochemical indices of bone resorption and clinical risk factors. Clinical risk factors that contribute to fracture risk independently of BMD include age, previous fragility fracture, premature menopause, a family history of hip fracture, and the use of oral corticosteroids. In the absence of validated population screening strategies, a case finding strategy is recommended based on the finding of risk factors. Treatment should be considered In individuals subsequently shown to have a high fracture risk. Because of the many techniques available for fracture risk assessment, the 10-year probability of fracture Is the desirable measurement to determine Intervention thresholds. Many treatments can be provided cost-effectively to men and women if hip fracture probability over 10 years ranges from 2% to 10% dependent on age.
引用
收藏
页码:1929 / 1936
页数:8
相关论文
共 62 条
  • [21] ROLE OF PEAK BONE MASS AND BONE LOSS IN POSTMENOPAUSAL OSTEOPOROSIS - 12 YEAR STUDY
    HANSEN, MA
    OVERGAARD, K
    RIIS, BJ
    CHRISTIANSEN, C
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1991, 303 (6808): : 961 - 964
  • [22] The interpretation and utility of ultrasound measurements of bone
    Heaney, RP
    Kanis, JA
    [J]. BONE, 1996, 18 (06) : 491 - 492
  • [23] AGE AND BONE MASS AS PREDICTORS OF FRACTURE IN A PROSPECTIVE-STUDY
    HUI, SL
    SLEMENDA, CW
    JOHNSTON, CC
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION, 1988, 81 (06) : 1804 - 1809
  • [24] RISK-FACTORS FOR HIP FRACTURE IN EUROPEAN WOMEN - THE MEDOS STUDY
    JOHNELL, O
    GULLBERG, B
    KANIS, JA
    ALLANDER, E
    ELFFORS, L
    DEQUEKER, J
    DILSEN, G
    GENNARI, C
    VAZ, AL
    LYRITIS, G
    MAZZUOLI, G
    MIRAVET, L
    PASSERI, M
    CANO, RP
    RAPADO, A
    RIBOT, C
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND MINERAL RESEARCH, 1995, 10 (11) : 1802 - 1815
  • [25] JOHNELL O, IN PRESS OSTEOPOROS
  • [26] Effect and offset of effect of treatments for hip fracture on health outcomes
    Jonsson, B
    Kanis, J
    Dawson, A
    Oden, A
    Johnell, O
    [J]. OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 1999, 10 (03) : 193 - 199
  • [27] Risk factors for hip fracture in men from Southern Europe: The MEDOS study
    Kanis, J
    Johnell, O
    Gullberg, B
    Allander, E
    Elffors, L
    Ranstam, J
    Dequeker, J
    Dilsen, G
    Gennari, C
    Vaz, AL
    Lyritis, G
    Mazzuoli, G
    Miravet, L
    Passeri, M
    Cano, RP
    Rapado, A
    Ribot, C
    [J]. OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 1999, 9 (01) : 45 - 54
  • [28] Guidelines for diagnosis and management of osteoporosis
    Kanis, JA
    Delmas, P
    Burckhardt, P
    Cooper, C
    Torgerson, D
    [J]. OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 1997, 7 (04) : 390 - 406
  • [29] Prediction of fracture from low bone mineral density measurements overestimates risk
    Kanis, JA
    Johnell, O
    Oden, A
    Jonsson, B
    De Laet, C
    Dawson, A
    [J]. BONE, 2000, 26 (04) : 387 - 391
  • [30] Ten-year risk of osteoporotic fracture and the effect of risk factors on screening strategies
    Kanis, JA
    Johnell, O
    Oden, A
    De Laet, C
    Jonsson, B
    Dawson, A
    [J]. BONE, 2002, 30 (01) : 251 - 258