Clinimetric evaluation of active range of motion measures in patients with non-specific neck pain: a systematic review

被引:142
作者
de Koning, Chantal H. P. [1 ]
van den Heuvel, Sylvia P. [2 ]
Staal, J. Bart [3 ,4 ]
Smits-Engelsman, Bouwien C. M. [1 ,5 ]
Hendriks, Erik J. M. [2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Professionals, Breda, Netherlands
[2] Dutch Inst Allied Hlth Care NPi, Amersfoort, Netherlands
[3] Maastricht Univ, Dept Epidemiol, Ctr Evidence Based Physiotherapy, Maastricht, Netherlands
[4] Maastricht Univ, Caphri Res Inst, Maastricht, Netherlands
[5] Dept Kinesiol, Motor Control Lab, Louvain, Belgium
关键词
non-specific neck pain; active range of motion; reproducibility of results; systematic review;
D O I
10.1007/s00586-008-0656-3
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
The study is to provide a critical analysis of the research literature on clinimetric properties of instruments that can be used in daily practice to measure active cervical range of motion (ACROM) in patients with non-specific neck pain. A computerized literature search was performed in Medline, Cinahl and Embase from 1982 to January 2007. Two reviewers independently assessed the clinimetric properties of identified instruments using a criteria list. The search identified a total of 33 studies, investigating three different types of measurement instruments to determine ACROM. These instruments were: (1) different types of goniometers/inclinometers, (2) visual estimation, and (3) tape measurements. Intra- and inter-observer reliability was demonstrated for the cervical range of motion instrument (CROM), Cybex electronic digital instrument (EDI-320) and a single inclinometer. The presence of agreement was assessed for the EDI-320 and a single inclinometer. The CROM received a positive rating for construct validity. When clinical acceptability is taken into account both the CROM and the single inclinometer can be considered appropriate instruments for measuring the active range of motion in patients with non-specific neck pain in daily practice. Reliability is the aspect most frequently evaluated. Agreement, validity and responsiveness are documented less frequently.
引用
收藏
页码:905 / 921
页数:17
相关论文
共 88 条
[1]
Validation of the Spin-T goniometer, a cervical range of motion device [J].
Agarwal, S ;
Allison, GT ;
Singer, KP .
JOURNAL OF MANIPULATIVE AND PHYSIOLOGICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2005, 28 (08) :604-609
[2]
Reliability of the Spin-T cervical goniometer in measuring cervical range of motion in an asymptomatic Indian population [J].
Agarwal, S ;
Allison, GT ;
Singer, KP .
JOURNAL OF MANIPULATIVE AND PHYSIOLOGICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2005, 28 (07) :487-492
[3]
ALANTARA H, 1994, SCAN J REHABIL MED, V14, P147
[4]
3-DIMENSIONAL ANALYSIS OF NECK MOTION A CLINICAL METHOD [J].
ALUND, M ;
LARSSON, SE .
SPINE, 1990, 15 (02) :87-91
[5]
Measuring range of active cervical rotation in a position of full head flexion using the 3D Fastrak measurement system: an intra-tester reliability study [J].
Amiri, M ;
Jull, G ;
Bullock-Saxton, J .
MANUAL THERAPY, 2003, 8 (03) :176-179
[6]
3D kinematic analysis and clinical evaluation of neck movements in patients with whiplash injury [J].
Antonaci, F ;
Bulgheroni, M ;
Ghirmai, S ;
Lanfranchi, S ;
Dalla Toffola, E ;
Sandrini, G ;
Nappi, G .
CEPHALALGIA, 2002, 22 (07) :533-542
[7]
Interobserver reliability of neck-mobility measurement by means of the flock-of-birds electromagnetic tracking system [J].
Assink, N ;
Bergman, GJD ;
Knoester, B ;
Winters, JC ;
Dijkstra, PU ;
Postema, K .
JOURNAL OF MANIPULATIVE AND PHYSIOLOGICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2005, 28 (06) :408-413
[8]
BALOGUN J A, 1989, Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy, V10, P248
[9]
Variation in the cervical range of motion over time measured by the "Flock of Birds" electromagnetic tracking system [J].
Bergman, GJD ;
Knoester, B ;
Assink, N ;
Dijkstra, PU ;
Winters, JC .
SPINE, 2005, 30 (06) :650-654
[10]
Bogduk N, 1984, Aust Fam Physician, V13, P26