A multivariate prediction model for microarray cross-hybridization

被引:55
作者
Chen, YA [1 ]
Chou, CC
Lu, XH
Slate, EH
Peck, K
Wu, WY
Voit, EO
Almeida, JS
机构
[1] Med Univ S Carolina, Dept Biostat Bioinformat & Epidemiol, Charleston, SC 29425 USA
[2] Natl Taiwan Univ, Ctr Genom Med, Taipei 10764, Taiwan
[3] Acad Sinica, Inst Biomed Sci, Taipei, Taiwan
[4] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Genet & Dev Biol, Key Lab Mol & Dev Biol, Beijing, Peoples R China
[5] Georgia Tech, Dept Biomed Engn, Atlanta, GA USA
[6] Univ Texas, MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Biostat & Appl Math, Houston, TX 77030 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1186/1471-2105-7-101
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Background: Expression microarray analysis is one of the most popular molecular diagnostic techniques in the post-genomic era. However, this technique faces the fundamental problem of potential cross-hybridization. This is a pervasive problem for both oligonucleotide and cDNA microarrays; it is considered particularly problematic for the latter. No comprehensive multivariate predictive modeling has been performed to understand how multiple variables contribute to (cross-)hybridization. Results: We propose a systematic search strategy using multiple multivariate models [multiple linear regressions, regression trees, and artificial neural network analyses (ANNs)] to select an effective set of predictors for hybridization. We validate this approach on a set of DNA microarrays with cytochrome p450 family genes. The performance of our multiple multivariate models is compared with that of a recently proposed third-order polynomial regression method that uses percent identity as the sole predictor. All multivariate models agree that the 'most contiguous base pairs between probe and target sequences,' rather than percent identity, is the best univariate predictor. The predictive power is improved by inclusion of additional nonlinear effects, in particular target GC content, when regression trees or ANNs are used. Conclusion: A systematic multivariate approach is provided to assess the importance of multiple sequence features for hybridization and of relationships among these features. This approach can easily be applied to larger datasets. This will allow future developments of generalized hybridization models that will be able to correct for false-positive cross- hybridization signals in expression experiments.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 59 条
[21]  
Huber Wolfgang, 2002, Bioinformatics, V18 Suppl 1, pS96
[22]   Design of a genome-wide siRNA library using an artificial neural network [J].
Huesken, D ;
Lange, J ;
Mickanin, C ;
Weiler, J ;
Asselbergs, F ;
Warner, J ;
Meloon, B ;
Engel, S ;
Rosenberg, A ;
Cohen, D ;
Labow, M ;
Reinhardt, M ;
Natt, F ;
Hall, J .
NATURE BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2005, 23 (08) :995-1001
[23]   Multiple-laboratory comparison of microarray platforms [J].
Irizarry, RA ;
Warren, D ;
Spencer, F ;
Kim, IF ;
Biswal, S ;
Frank, BC ;
Gabrielson, E ;
Garcia, JGN ;
Geoghegan, J ;
Germino, G ;
Griffin, C ;
Hilmer, SC ;
Hoffman, E ;
Jedlicka, AE ;
Kawasaki, E ;
Martínez-Murillo, F ;
Morsberger, L ;
Lee, H ;
Petersen, D ;
Quackenbush, J ;
Scott, A ;
Wilson, M ;
Yang, YQ ;
Ye, SQ ;
Yu, W .
NATURE METHODS, 2005, 2 (05) :345-349
[24]  
Kleinbaum DG., 1988, APPL REGRESSION ANAL, P369
[25]   Microarray results: how accurate are they? [J].
Kothapalli, R ;
Yoder, SJ ;
Mane, S ;
Loughran, TP .
BMC BIOINFORMATICS, 2002, 3 (1)
[26]   Independence and reproducibility across microarray platforms [J].
Larkin, JE ;
Frank, BC ;
Gavras, H ;
Sultana, R ;
Quackenbush, J .
NATURE METHODS, 2005, 2 (05) :337-343
[27]   A fractional programming approach to efficient DNA melting temperature calculation [J].
Leber, M ;
Kaderali, L ;
Schönhuth, A ;
Schrader, R .
BIOINFORMATICS, 2005, 21 (10) :2375-2382
[28]   Selection of optimal DNA oligos for gene expression arrays [J].
Li, FG ;
Stormo, GD .
BIOINFORMATICS, 2001, 17 (11) :1067-1076
[29]  
LIPSHUTZ RJ, 1995, BIOTECHNIQUES, V19, P442
[30]   Getting the noise out of gene arrays [J].
Marshall, E .
SCIENCE, 2004, 306 (5696) :630-631