Interplay of meaning, syntax and working memory during pronoun resolution investigated by ERPs

被引:35
作者
Hammer, Anke [1 ]
Jansma, Bernadette M. [2 ]
Lamers, Monique [3 ]
Munte, Thomas F. [1 ]
机构
[1] Otto VonGuericke Univ Magdegurg, FNW Inst Psychol, Dept Neuropsychol, D-39016 Magdeburg, Germany
[2] Maastricht Univ, Fac Psychol & Neurosci, Dept Cognit Neurosci, Maastricht, Netherlands
[3] Univ Nijmegen, Dept Linguist, Nijmegen, Netherlands
关键词
language; pronoun processing; working memory; syntax; meaning; event-related potential (ERP); N400; P600;
D O I
10.1016/j.brainres.2008.07.004
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Event-related potentials were used to investigate the interaction of verbal working memory and gender information during pronoun resolution. Gender information is supposed to be disentangled using sentences about persons (semantic/syntactic) or things (syntactic) followed by gender congruent or incongruent pronouns. Memory was manipulated using differential distances (short distance (SD) and long distances with or without intermediate subject gaps (LD gap and LD no gap)) between the pronoun and the antecedent. Comparing incongruent to congruent conditions, person sentences with SD and LD no gap resulted in an N400-like effect indicating the involvement of semantic integration, whereas a P600 effect in LD gap (re-activated antecedents) sentences suggested the involvement of syntactic reanalysis. SD-thing sentences showed a P600 effect, whereas LD thing sentences revealed no effect at pronoun position. A delayed N400 effect for thing sentences was observed instead. Based on preceding and the current data, we present a working model on how the parser switches between the use of semantic and syntactic information to establish co-reference and how this switch depends on the type of antecedent, distance, or syntactic structure. (c) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:177 / 191
页数:15
相关论文
共 64 条
[1]  
Baayen RH., 1996, The celex lexical database (cd-rom)
[2]   Task switching and novelty processing activate a common neural network for cognitive control [J].
Barcelo, Francisco ;
Escera, Carles ;
Corral, Maria J. ;
Perianez, Jose A. .
JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2006, 18 (10) :1734-1748
[3]   Time course of top-down and bottom-up influences on syllable processing in the auditory cortex [J].
Bonte, M ;
Parviainen, T ;
Hytönen, K ;
Salmelin, R .
CEREBRAL CORTEX, 2006, 16 (01) :115-123
[4]  
BORNKESSEL I, BRAIN RES IN PRESS, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.BRAINRESREV.2008.0S.003
[5]   The extended argument dependency model: A neurocognitive approach to sentence comprehension across languages [J].
Bornkessel, Ina ;
Schlesewsky, Matthias .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 2006, 113 (04) :787-821
[6]   LANGUAGE COMPREHENSION - SENTENCE AND DISCOURSE PROCESSING [J].
CARPENTER, PA ;
MIYAKE, A ;
JUST, MA .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PSYCHOLOGY, 1995, 46 :91-120
[7]   IN SEARCH OF REFERENTS FOR NOUNS AND PRONOUNS [J].
CLARK, HH ;
SENGUL, CJ .
MEMORY & COGNITION, 1979, 7 (01) :35-41
[8]   ERPs and domain specificity: Beating a straw horse [J].
Coulson, S ;
King, JW ;
Kutas, M .
LANGUAGE AND COGNITIVE PROCESSES, 1998, 13 (06) :653-672
[9]   THE INDEPENDENCE OF SYNTACTIC PROCESSING [J].
FERREIRA, F ;
CLIFTON, C .
JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 1986, 25 (03) :348-368
[10]   Syntactic working memory and the establishment of filler-gap dependencies: Insights from ERPs and fMRI [J].
Fiebach, CJ ;
Schlesewsky, M ;
Friederici, AD .
JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLINGUISTIC RESEARCH, 2001, 30 (03) :321-338